Git Ignore Everything

Behold the sacred gender symbols of our time! Female? Simple. Male? Basic. But a PROGRAMMER ? Honey, that's a whole different species with arrows pointing in MULTIPLE directions simultaneously while juggling a USB stick! Because why commit to just ONE path when you can have 17 git branches, 42 browser tabs, and an existential crisis before lunch? The programmer gender doesn't just multitask—it multi-EXISTS in parallel universes where both solutions work and fail at the same time. Schrödinger's code, darling!

HONEY, PLEASE! Who has time for GitHub's intended purpose when you can exploit it as your personal cloud storage?! 💅 The AUDACITY of developers using a version control platform for... *gasp*... version control! Meanwhile, the rest of us GENIUSES are uploading our vacation photos and meme collections to repositories called "definitely-important-code-stuff". Free storage is free storage, darling, and I'm not about to pay for Dropbox when I can just push my 4K cat pictures to main! #HackingTheSystem

The only happy person in this lineup is the programmer surrounded by colorful syntax highlighting while everyone else deals with relationship drama. The rest are stuck in arguments that could've been avoided with a simple git commit. Relationship status: Committed to master branch.

Microsoft's official account telling dad jokes while Azure is burning in the background is peak corporate comedy. The replies absolutely commit to reality: "git back to fixing azure" because apparently the cloud is down... again. Nothing says "we're a serious tech company" like posting knock-knock jokes during an outage. The contrast between the cheerful dad joke and the "please fix our production environment" replies is chef's kiss perfection. It's like watching someone arrange deck chairs on the Titanic, but with version control puns.

The soul-crushing TRAUMA of completing all your pull request tasks only to be AMBUSHED by SonarQube's code quality checks! 😱 There you are, thinking you're DONE, ready to push that glorious code... and BOOM! SonarQube shows up like an uninvited party guest screaming about your 47 code smells, 12 vulnerabilities, and that ONE line where you dared to use a deprecated method. The audacity! Your perfectly functional code is now apparently a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY because you didn't follow some arbitrary coding standard that nobody mentioned until NOW. And fixing these issues? Just kiss your weekend goodbye, honey! 💅

The classic code review paradox! When you hand a dev 10 lines of code, they transform into the world's most meticulous detective—finding edge cases, style issues, and optimization opportunities that would make Sherlock Holmes proud. But somehow, drop 500 lines in their lap and suddenly they've got their rubber stamp ready: "LGTM!" (Looks Good To Me). It's like our brains short-circuit when faced with too much code. The cognitive overload kicks in and we just... give up. "Life's too short to read all this. I trust you didn't break anything in those other 490 lines!" And don't even get me started on pull requests with 5000+ lines. That's when you see the mythical "ship it" comment appear within 30 seconds of submission. Pure magic!