The Future Of Html.

Content KIDDOS ARGUING IF HTML IS A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE ME PROGRAMMING A WASHING MACHINE

Content No it doesn't effect my baby 30 years later: Coorel Machine Learning Using HTML Tools Required Browser - Google chrome Firefox. Understanding of basic HiML. THAT'S IT!!! Learn Complete AI and Deep learning using HiMl No Need to INSTALL ANY TOOLS OR LIBS !! Vedio1: Linear Learning Using HTML. 0:02 20:04 introc Machine Learning Using HTML from Scratch AI DeepLearning ML MachineLearning

Content Yansh yansh Replying to benawad Make a VSCode extension where you can roast other people's code. 8:51 AM Dec 17, 2020 Twitter Web App 1 Quote Tweet 2 Likes 17 Ben Awad benawad 1m Replying to yansh StackOverflow already exists 9 1 4 000 000

Content Ijust wanted to add to this discussion that I am just compiling on VS and GCC, and used to use include guards. I have now switched to pragma once, and the only reason for me is not 199 performance or portability or standard as I don't really care what is standard as long as VS and GCC support it, and that is that: pragma once reduces possibilities for bugs. It is all too easy to copy and paste a header file to another header file, modify it to suit ones needs, and forget to change the name of the include guard. Once both are included, it takes you a while to track down the error, as the error messages arent necessarily clear. Share Follow edited Nov 30, 2014 at 9:57 answered Jul 22, 2011 at 16:55 Cookie 11.7k 13 52 81 5 This is the correct reason. Forget performance--we should use pragma once because it's less error prone. It occurs to me that if compilers are already tracking include guards, they're already doing most of the work necessary to issue warnings when they see different files using the same macro name. - rieux Jun 13, 2019 at 6:36 Add a comment pragma once has unfixable bugs. It should never be used. 169 If your include search path is sufficiently complicated, the compiler may be unable to tell the difference between two headers with the same basename (e.g. afoo.h and bfoo.h), so a pragma once in one of them will suppress both. It may also be unable to tell that two different relative includes (e.g. include "foo.h" and include "..afoo.h" refer to the same file, so pragma once will fail to suppress a redundant include when it should have. lanc arca attocic tho commorc amia

Content TypeScript Frontend who wants to flex on strong typed languages Backend who couldn't comprehend weak typed languages

STOP EVERYTHING! The most accurate portrayal of full stack development I've ever witnessed! 😱 This poor child accidentally became the PERFECT metaphor for what happens when you're forced to know 37 frameworks, 12 languages, and still make it to stand-up by 9am! The disheveled hair! The dead-inside eyes! The formal attire that screams "I have a client meeting at 2 but need to debug a production issue at 1:59"! Truly the walking corpse that emerges after trying to figure out why your CSS works in Chrome but breaks in Safari while simultaneously setting up a database that refuses to connect for absolutely no logical reason whatsoever. Not a zombie—just a developer who's seen one too many merge conflicts!