Who Needs Breakpoints Anyway?

Nothing says "modern developer" quite like pasting ChatGPT responses into production and calling yourself "full-stack." The sad Pepe frog knows the truth – your stack is just HTML you barely understand, vibes you're desperately faking, and bugs you can't fix without asking AI for help again. The tears aren't from debugging; they're from the realization that your entire career is held together by prompts and prayers.

Content JS factorial.js ... 1 JavaScript expert: 2 No, you cannot use a single identifier in your code. 3 You will get multiple errors about name conflicts. 4 5 const factorial function factorial (factorial, factorial, factorial) 6 7 8 factorialfactorial, factorial:factorialfactorial. factorial? factorial.factorial--factorialfactorialfactorial(factorial):-factorial; 9 10 return factorial factorialfactorial (factorial); 11 12 13 console. log(factorial(...,,7)); 14 15 JavaScript: hold my beer. PROBLEMS OUTPUT DEBUG CONSOLE usrlocalbinnode factorial.js 5040 ProarammerHumor.io TERMINAL

The meme shows a ridiculous mashup of a serious war game with a cartoonish vehicle - specifically Ronald McDonald's car photoshopped into a Battlefield combat scene. It's mocking how game franchises can lose their identity when acquired by different publishers. This is basically what happens when you merge codebases without proper integration testing. One minute you're writing a realistic military simulator, then someone pushes to production and suddenly your JSON config is referencing assets from the McDonald's Happy Meal app. The "PRE-ALPHA GAMEPLAY" label is the cherry on top - like when your PM demos a half-baked feature to stakeholders and you're frantically typing "git checkout previous_version" in the background.

That sleek Lamborghini front? That's the elegant snippet you copied from Stack Overflow that actually works. The bus attached to it? That's the unholy monstrosity you cobbled together to make it fit your codebase. Twenty years in this industry and I've never seen a developer who hasn't built this automotive abomination at least once. The real skill isn't finding the perfect solution—it's making that solution coexist with your legacy spaghetti code without the whole thing bursting into flames during the demo.

Oh, the classic programmer's trade-off! Started coding for the joy of creating something from nothing, ended up with a spine that's more twisted than my spaghetti code. That raccoon is every developer after a 12-hour debugging session, wondering if their ergonomic chair was actually designed by someone who hates humans. The vintage CRT monitor is just *chef's kiss* - nothing says "my posture is doomed" like hunching over ancient hardware trying to find that missing semicolon. The real bug was in our vertebrae all along!

Content What we say What we mean Horrible hack Horrible hack that I didn't write Temporary workaround Horrible hack that I wrote It's broken There are bugs in your code It has a few issues There are bugs in my code Obscure Someone else's code doesn't have comments Self-documenting My code doesn't have comments That's why it's an awesome language It's my favorite language and it's really easy to do something in it. You're thinking in the wrong mindset It's my favorite language and it's really hard to do something in it. I can read this Perl script I wrote this Perl script I can't read this Perl script I didn't write this Perl script Bad structure Someone else's code is badly organized Complex structure My code is badly organized Bug The absence of a feature I like Out of scope The absence of a feature I don't like Clean solution It works and I understand it We need to rewrite it It works but I don't understand it emacs is better than vi it's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war vi is better than emacs It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war IMHO You are wrong Legacy code It works, but no one knows how XCquitVESCESCC I don't know how to quit vi