Troubleshooting The Same Code

Content Kyle Hill 2 days ago Subscribe Engineers "I made this highly precise and comprehensive technical blueprint so you know exactly how this works" Physicists 11 "It doesn't actually look like this, we're just simplifying the mathematical structure to make it easier for you to understand" Mathematicians This is a subset. I drew it like this so you wouldn't get any information from it. I've got no idea what's inside it - functions, words, bugs. Please stop asking it really doesn't matter. the red arrow represents a morphism ProarammerHumor.io

Content STOP DOING COMPUTER SCIENCE Computers were supposed to solve math, NOT to be programmed C is a LETTER, not a language Wanna print() something? Write it in a PAPER with a PEN "I'm writing a recursive method with threads to optimize the CPU usage in a 0.02" THIS IS A NONSENSICAL STATEMENT MADE BY DERANGED PEOPLE Look at what PROGRAMMERS have been demanding your respect for, after all the led lights we put in their computers: (This is real COMPUTER SCIENCE, done by real COMPUTER SCIENTISTS): edev a EDEV BASEename exist ok True) actidir CONDABASEename'etccondaa deacdir CONDABASEename etcconda os. makedirs (acts dir, existok True) os.makedirs deac exist con actidir'edevon.sh' eoff a deac dir'edevoff.sh' if not os.path.is link(con): os. symlink(BIN'edevon.sh', con) if not os-path os.symlink(BIN x Syntax error on token throws interface exp Syntax error on token expected after this tC Syntax error, insert SimpleName to complete Qi Syntax error, insert Identifier ( to complete Meth Syntax error, insert to complete MethodDeclar Syntax error on token expected Java(1610612 asyntax error on token expected after this toke Syntax error, insert J to compiete InterfaceBod TextProcessorUsing Hashmaps.java The method fileAnalysish is undefined for the type FUNNY COLORED LETTERS 178 COMPILATION ERRORS????? A FAKE TEAPOT YOU CAN'T USE IF PROGRAMMING WAS REAL HOW COME NOBODY THOUGHT IN DOING while(true) print(money); THEY PLAYED US FOR ABSOLUTE FOOLS

The absolute state of game development priorities. Summoning a demon from the fiery depths of hell? Just a few lines of code, ship it! Adding a simple scarf texture? Sorry, that would require rewriting the entire engine and possibly sacrificing a junior developer to the QA gods. It's like how we can build entire virtual worlds with complex physics simulations, but somehow adding a dark mode to the UI makes the entire codebase collapse like a house of cards. The real dark magic is figuring out which features will inexplicably break everything.

Ah, the Faustian bargain of Rust programming. You surrender your mental wellbeing to the borrow checker gods, and in return, they promise your code won't segfault at 2 AM in production. After 15 years of watching C++ codebases implode spectacularly, I'd make that trade too. The compiler yells at you for eight hours straight until you're questioning your career choices, but hey—no more "undefined behavior" or memory leaks bringing down your servers. It's basically paying therapy bills upfront instead of incident response bills later.

The eternal developer struggle: spending four hours trying to force a flip-flop through a sock when you could've just spent five minutes reading the manual. The documentation is right there, beckoning with its sweet knowledge, but no—we'd rather perform sock contortionism while muttering "this should work" for the 47th time. And then have the audacity to complain that the library is "poorly designed" when our sock-sandal monstrosity inevitably fails. The real tragedy? We'll do it again tomorrow.

Content Me with Computer Science degree Relatives asking me to fix their printer