The Reluctant Documentation Reader

Content X A Visual Studio Rate Your Visual Studio Experience 3. What does Visual Studio do really well? crash T Prev Next

Content

OpenAI announces they've achieved AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), and their proof? A GitHub repo with 5,000+ open issues. Nothing screams "superintelligent AI capable of solving any human task" quite like a massive backlog of unresolved bugs and feature requests. The irony is chef's kiss—true AGI would probably start by closing its own issues, but here we are with a repo that looks like every other abandoned side project. If this is AGI, then my personal projects with 47 unread notifications are basically sentient beings at this point.

The bell curve of programmer confidence strikes again! On the far left and right, we have the 0.1% geniuses who genuinely know how to improve performance. But that sweaty, panicked 34% in the middle? That's the rest of us, desperately chanting "IF IT'S WORKING, DON'T TOUCH IT" like it's a sacred mantra. Nothing captures the development lifecycle quite like the transition from "I can optimize this garbage" to "Dear god, it compiled, NOBODY MOVE" to "Watch me refactor this entire codebase." The middle is where the true wisdom lies – sometimes the bravest engineering decision is no decision at all.

Content SALES TEAM TO DEVS WHEN THE PRODUCT CRASHES DURING A CUSTOMER DEMO: Please commit seppuku by sunset tomorrow.

The code comment redundancy epidemic has reached street signs! Just like that sign helpfully pointing out "THIS IS A STOP SIGN" under an actual stop sign, junior devs have a special talent for writing comments that state the painfully obvious: // This function adds two numbers function add(a, b) {   return a + b; // Returns the sum } Senior devs scrolling through that code base are experiencing physical pain right now. Remember folks: good comments explain why , not what . Unless you're documenting an API, in which case... carry on with your obvious statements!