The Law Of Bug Conservation

The software development journey in two panels: Junior devs: "I'll just rebuild the entire codebase this weekend!" *enthusiastic arm flailing* Senior devs: "Change a label color? Let me explain why that requires refactoring three subsystems, migrating a database, and getting approval from seven different stakeholders." The irony? Both are wearing "RUN CMD" shirts, but only one knows the true runtime complexity of production code. Seniors aren't lazy—they've just stepped on enough legacy landmines to develop a healthy sense of terror.

Why fix what's broken when you can just throw it away and build it again from scratch in Rust? Developers turning their noses up at the sensible option of refactoring existing code because the siren call of rewriting everything in a shiny new language is just too tempting. Sure, it'll take 6 months longer, introduce 47 new bugs, and the business stakeholders will be pulling their hair out, but hey—at least you'll get to tell everyone at meetups that you're "memory safe" now.

Look at me ignoring that README file like it's my ex's text messages. We've all been there—excitedly diving into a shiny new library, completely bypassing the documentation because "how hard could it be?" Then two hours later, after fighting bizarre errors and contemplating a career change to goat farming, we're crawling back to that README with our tail between our legs. The documentation was there the whole time, patiently waiting for us to admit we're not as clever as we thought. It's the programming circle of life.

Content Learning programming to make useful programs Learning programming to make games Learning programming to make Reddit bots Learning programming to hack source code from a crappy game you found on Steam and then debug it Hire a bad programmer and learn programming to fix his software Learn programming to make a top post on rProgrammingHumor ProarammerHumor.io

Content When you stare at your code for 2 hours and you finally get a different error

Ah, the eternal developer mantra: "It works on my machine!" – the universal get-out-of-jail-free card that drives product managers to the brink of insanity. When your code is held together by duct tape, caffeine, and that specific arrangement of lucky rubber ducks on your desk, of course shipping the entire workstation seems like the only logical solution. Why bother with reproducible steps when you can just FedEx your entire development environment? The product manager's face is basically every non-technical person who's ever had to translate "it works on my machine" into actual customer support. Meanwhile, the reasonable developer on the right is that one team member who actually documents their code and doesn't rely on 47 undocumented environment variables to make their application run.