The Last Fix: Add More Semicolons

The eternal struggle of picking up where you left off! The proper way? Detailed commit messages. The realistic way? Random notes. The galaxy brain way? Frantically mashing Ctrl+Z until you recognize something, followed by the inevitable panic of realizing you went too far and desperately hitting Ctrl+Shift+Z to recover. Nothing says "professional software engineer" quite like time-traveling through your code history via undo/redo shortcuts while muttering obscenities under your breath.

When your codebase relies on documentation written during the Bush administration. Legolas here perfectly captures that moment when you realize the docs were written by an ancient developer who has long since departed to the Undying Lands (or Google). First panel: "My documentation is old" - You're hopeful it might still be relevant. Second panel: "very old" - Reality sinks in. This predates your programming language's current syntax. Third panel: "Full of memory" - Filled with references to deprecated functions and memory management techniques nobody uses anymore. Fourth panel: "and anger" - The inevitable emotion when you realize you'll have to reverse-engineer everything yourself while cursing whoever left this archaeological artifact behind.

Content DEFINE MADNESS COMPILE ERROR COMPILE ERROR COMPILE ERROR COMPILE ERROR COMPILE ERROR COMPILE ERROR C'MON ALREADYI MEANWHILE IN THE COMPILER HE RECOMPILED THE SAME CODE AGAIN, SHOULD WE STOP? ERR ERR ERA EPR ERR ERROR MONKEYUSER.COM

Ah yes, entering an ugly syntax competition with C++ is like bringing a knife to a nuclear war. The language that gave us std::vector<std::map<std::string, std::shared_ptr<AbstractFactoryImpl>>>::const_iterator has been traumatizing developers since 1985. It's the language equivalent of that friend who says "hold my beer" before doing something spectacularly dangerous. Template metaprogramming alone should qualify as a war crime under the Geneva Convention.

Look at that beautiful pointer declaration! int *&&&&&* p; is basically C++ saying "I heard you like references to pointers so I put references in your pointers so you can dereference while you reference." The syntax is so absurdly convoluted it's like trying to navigate a maze blindfolded after drinking three energy drinks. This is why senior devs wake up in cold sweats at 3 AM. Memory management nightmares aren't just for sleeping anymore!

Content "Private" instance variables that cannot be accessed except from inside an object don't exist in Python. However, there is a convention that is followed by most Python code: a name prefixed with an underscore (e.q. spam) should be treated as a non-public part of the API (whether it is a function, a method or a data member). It should be considered an imple- mentation detail and subject to change without notice. Should I just H have private variables? No. It's the other languages that are wrong.