Obfuscate Code

Content mCC Follow mcclure111 In C we don't say "Missing asterisk" we say "error C2664: 'void std:vectorblock,std:allocatorTy:push back(const block x)': cannot convert argument 1 from 'std.: Vector iteratorstd.: Vector valstd.: Si mpletypesblock' to 'block '" and i think that's beautiful 4:30 PM - 1 Jun 2018 292 Retweets 926 Likes 20 17 292 926

Content Re: Regression - prockmsg does not ... From Jukka Ollila Greg KH Jukka Ollila Alan Cox Linus Torvalds Tallen Allie. Sent On Jul 6, 2012 10:45 am Jul 6, 2012 10:54 am Jul 6, 2012 11:45 am Jul 6, 2012 12:34 pm Jul 6, 2012 1:30 pm 1ul a 3019 2.05 nm Subject: Re: Regression - prockmsg does not (always) block for 1-byte reads From: Linus Torvalds (torvlinux-foundation.org) Date: Jul 6, 2012 1:30:01 pm List: org. kernel. vger.linux-kernel Kay, this needs to be fixed. Suggested fix: just use the 'seg printf0' interfaces, which do the proper buffering, and allow any size reads of various packetized data. Of course, I'd also suggest that whoever was the genius who thought it was a good idea to read things ONE FCKING BYTE AT A TIME with system calls for each byte should be retroactively aborted. Who the fck does idiotic things like that? How did they noty die as babies, considering that they were likely too stupid to find a tit to suck on? Linus

First panel: Code compiles perfectly with no errors or warnings. Pure bliss! A mythical unicorn moment! Second panel: "Let me just recompile without changing anything to make sure it wasn't a glitch in the Matrix..." Third panel: Suddenly 8,191 errors and 16,383 warnings appear. Classic. Fourth panel: Programmer's soul leaves body. The compiler is basically gaslighting you. "It worked? That must be a mistake, let me fix that for you." Schrödinger's code - simultaneously working and catastrophically broken until you dare to observe it twice.

The eternal battle between sophisticated debugging tools and the humble print statement. When faced with a complex bug, we all pretend we'll use those fancy debuggers with breakpoints and stack traces. Then reality hits and we're just throwing print("test") statements everywhere like a medieval knight charging into battle with nothing but a shield and pure audacity. Sure, IDEs offer us the programming equivalent of nuclear weapons, but sometimes you just want to stab the problem with a pointy stick and see what leaks out. The simplest solution is often the most reliable—especially when you're on your 5th coffee and deadline was yesterday.

The perfect encapsulation of tech industry decision-making! Instead of addressing the root problems of unstable, unmaintainable code bases, let's just hire more "vibe coders" who prioritize aesthetic GitHub profiles over documentation. Nothing says "we've fixed our technical debt" like bringing in developers who commit with messages like "✨ fixed stuff ✨" without explaining what they actually did. Next sprint feature: AI-generated commit messages that somehow contain even less information than "updated code"!

Content THIS IS WHY YOU SHOULDN'T INTERRUPT A PROGRAMMER if c backtrack 1 iP c es ' backtrock Eo. ... so if the current character is a comma, we set the back- tracking Flag... 110-9) commit 5765 to here CLI ENTRY. , Sarah wrote this, causeo bug POINT parse logic? or did it just sroose it? NEW CONFIG): REMOTE CONFIG FORMAT PARSER LOADER CALLBACK FOR 7. CONFIG STATE no access to SOUR sh we just r stare lorerr HEY, SO I JUST SENT YOU AN EMAIL ABOUT THAT THING Jason Heeris 2013 LICENSE: CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 AU heeris.id.au