Junior Shocked Senior Rocked At Every Intense Situation

Content It's a time zone change on December 31st in shanghal. See this pace for details of 1927 11860 in Shanghai. Basically at midnight at the end of 1927, the clocks went back 5 minutes and 52 seconds. So "1927-12-31 23:54:08" actually happened twice, and it looks like Java is parsing it as the later possible instant for that local datetime - hence the Just another episode in the often weird and wonderful world of time zones. rebuilt with version 20132 01 1.98. The original question would no ionger demonstrate quite the same behaviour. In 2013a, the result would be 358 seconds, with a transition time of 23-54-03 instead of 23:54:08 I only noticed this because I'm collecting questions like this in Noda Time, in the form of unit tests... The test has now been changed, but it just goes to show - not even historical data is safe In TZDB 2014f, the time of the change has moved to 1900-12-31, and it's now a mere 343 second change (so the time between t and t1 IS 344 seconds, it vou see what I mean). To answer a question around a transition at 1900... it looks like the Java time zone implementation treats all time zones as simply being in their standard time for any instant before the start of 1900 UTC: public class Test public static void main(String args) throws Exception Long for (String id : TimeZone getAvailableIDs) Time?one Zone TimeZone.getTimeZone (id); zone. getraworset zone.gecurtsetstart Sustem.out.println(id); The code above produces no output on my Windows machine. So any time zone which has any offset other than its standard one at the start of 1900 will count that as a transition. 1ZDB itself has some data going back earlier than that, and doesn't rely on any idea of a "fixed standard time (which is what getawOffset assumes to be a valid concept) so other libraries need t introduce this artiticial transition edited Mar 27. 2023 at 19:45 9 54 72 newered lul 27. 2011 at 8:31 Jon Skeet 1.4m 873 49186 4 Our is it still accurate? Son Sees

Content AI can write code. We need write clear requirements, read and debug Al code. imaflip.com Managers don't need programmers anymore. We need write clear requirements, read and debug Al code.

Content

That thousand-yard stare when you've just spent hours debugging someone's ChatGPT-generated WordPress PHP abomination. The code technically "works" but violates every coding standard known to mankind. You've fixed it, but at what cost? Your soul? Your sanity? Both? This is the face of a developer who just discovered 17 nested if statements and a function named "do_the_thing_please_work()" with 300 lines of uncommented spaghetti code. The war flashbacks are real.

Cross-platform development promised us sleek futuristic vehicles gliding smoothly across Linux, macOS, and Windows. Instead, we got a post-apocalyptic convoy hauling PyInstaller, DLLs, .NET runtime, Chromium (because why NOT bundle an entire browser?), Unity runtime, inpackage, and Node.js like they're essential survival supplies in Mad Max. The expectation: Write once, run anywhere! The reality: Write once, spend three weeks figuring out why it works on your machine but explodes on literally every other platform. Bonus points for the 500MB "lightweight" app that's basically Electron wearing a trench coat pretending to be native. Nothing says "cross-platform efficiency" quite like shipping half the internet just to display a button. Beautiful.

The classic developer trap: "I'll just use threads to solve this!" Fast forward 10 minutes and you're debugging race conditions, deadlocks, and wondering why your CPU is on fire. It's like trying to fix a leaky pipe with a flamethrower—technically you've solved the original problem, but now your house is burning down. Multithreading: turning one straightforward problem into an exciting collection of non-deterministic nightmares since the dawn of computing.