Error 3251: Vibes Critically Low

The modern developer's balancing act, visualized with stunning accuracy. That precarious tower of cans represents what's actually holding up your code—a foundation of ChatGPT at the bottom (let's be honest, it's writing half your functions), Google searches above it (for the errors ChatGPT creates), followed by pure dumb luck, ancient GitHub repositories you found at 3 AM, and tutorial videos from that one Indian guy who explains algorithms better than your $200K computer science degree. And finally, at the very top, desperately balancing on this tower of digital desperation? Your actual code—looking just as confused as that dog wondering how it got up there and how long before the whole thing collapses during the next sprint review.

Content Safari tries to fill username 25 Open ) quarterdeck opened this issue yesterday 8 comments quarterdeck commented yesterday What do you want to do? krisquarterdeck.co.uk From this website Other Usernames... 1 Course in Up Next quarterdeck commented 6 hours ago edited Author Upon further investigation this seems like an absolutely crazy Safari bug and I'm not sure if it can be worked around or not. I noticed that this was only happening on one page of our app. So I systematically commented out each section of HTML to see if any block was affecting it and I found one! 1 narrowed it down to a single p tag which contained the text "Welcome back,". I thought the comma might be causing an issue (no idea why) so I removed it. No change. I thought the word "back" might be making Safari think this was a login page for some reason? So I removed it and it fixed the issue! Crazy. Out of curiosity I tried removing "Welcome" and adding "back" back in. Still didn't re-occur. ?! So it seems only the combination of words "welcome back" causes this to happen. Absolutely no idea why. To confirm I chose another page randomly and put the phrase "welcome back" in a random position on the page and low and behold it caused this to happen again. For some reason the presence of these words on the page is adding the following to the Shadow DOM of the input field: div pseudo"-webkit-credentials-auto-fill-button" role "button" aria-label"password AutoFill" style-"display: Easily the most bizarre bug I've ever come across. 34 106 39 177

Content void anyFunction() if (wifi) if (login) if (admin) if (admin) if (admin) if (admin) if (admin) if (admin) seeAdminPanel (); else debugPrint ('Must be an administrator"); 7 else debugPrint ('Must be an administrator"); else debugPrint ('Must be an administrator'); else debugPrint ('Must be an administrator'); else debugPrint ('Must be an administrator'); else debugPrint ('Must be an administrator'); else else debugPrint ('Must login in your account"); debugPrint ('Must be connected to Wifi");

Content If you ever feel useless, just remember this code catch (error) throw error;

Content using ffmpeg through command line using ffmpeg through C api case AVMEDIATYPEVIDEO: c-codec id (bit rate" Resolution c-width c-height (AVRational) (in seconds) in t For fixed-fps content, mp increments should be SEAM FRAME RATE J; PVERVA PEG2VIDEO) GLVIDEO effs overflow. happens here ch the luma plane

Content - ballbase 72 points 1 day ago What does sacrifice child mean in this context? permalink source embed save save-RES report give award reply hide child comments -J Schnickatavick 234 points 1 day ago (last edited 1 day ago) I don't know the term "sacrifice", but generally killing a child means that a parent process needs to terminate a secondary (child) process that it started. I would assume based on context that a sacrifice is just ending a child process to save memory? Regardless, threading has some of the most messed up terminology for seemingly no reason. It's the only place where "killing orphans" or "zombie children" are normal terms permalink source embed save save-Res parent report give award reply hide child comments - TechCubeTetrabyte us 61 points 1 day ago Zombie children? Like, unaccounted for by the OS? permalink source embed save save-RES parent report give award reply hide child comments - Schnickatavick 128 points 1 day ago - It's a child process that finished its task and closed, but the parent process hasn't acknowledged it yet. It leaves it in this awkward state where it's terminated (dead) but it still has to hang around in memory (like a zombie) until the parent process can receive the child's "return" values, which let's the OS wipe it from memory, which is called reaping. Which is another messed up term, the OS is literally a "reaper" for dead processes? Who named this stuff? permalink source embed save saveRES parent report give award reply hide child comments - TerrorBite 55 points 1 day ago - The child itself has already died or been killed at that point; what isn't released yet is the child's entry in the PID table, as the return code (which the parent needs to read) needs to be stored somewhere. So the only thing the zombie process is taking up at that point, is a PID number and a few kB at most of metadata in the kernel. You can't kill a zombie process, because it's already dead. The only way to get rid of it is to kill the lazy parent; the zombie will then be re-parented to init, which will clean it up immediately. Dermalink source embed unsave parent report give award reply hide child comments - Schnickatavick 69 points 1 day ago The only way to get rid of it is to kill the lazy parent The child itself has already died or been killed the zombie will then be re-parented See! What's with this phrasing?! But yeah, that's exactly right Dermalink source embed unsave parent report oive award rediv nice child comments