The Database Russian Roulette

The classic security vs. speed dilemma, now with extra "vibe" energy! This senior engineer discovered that permission checks were blocking users, so the galaxy brain solution? Just nuke the entire security layer! Nothing says "ship it fast" like making your database rules "more permissive for now" (narrator: it stayed that way forever). The -7 deletions in the commit diff are probably all those pesky security checks that were just cramping everyone's style. Who needs data protection when you've got vibes ?

Running an UPDATE without a WHERE clause on production. The digital equivalent of nuking your entire city because one building had a broken window. Every single row in that table just got the same value, which in this case means everyone's now an admin. The intern's LinkedIn status just changed to "Open to Work" and the DBA is already reaching for the backup tapes. Fun fact: This is why database transactions have a rollback feature, though something tells me this particular update was already committed with the confidence of someone who's never made a mistake before.

Content LESSON 1: How to indicate to your colleagues that they should improve their PR. There aren't enough swear-words in the English language, so now I'll have to call you perkeleen vittup just to express my disgust and frustration with this crap.

Storing passwords in plain text? That's not a security flaw, that's a cry for help. Someone out there built a website where you could log in as User A, casually change User B's password, and the system just... let it happen. Because why hash passwords when you can live dangerously? The real kicker? They're posting this in r/google_antigravity expecting sympathy, as if Google's AI products should somehow be immune to the consequences of Security 101 violations. Spoiler alert: even the most advanced AI can't protect you from storing credentials like it's 1995. The "Venting" tag really ties it all together. Nothing says professional development quite like discovering your authentication system is basically a public notepad with extra steps.

The function loops through ALL USERS to find one with matching credentials instead of using a proper query. The comment is the chef's kiss: "This only works because there are not many users." It's like saying "my car doesn't need brakes because I don't drive fast." Bonus security nightmare: they're storing password hashes but comparing them directly instead of hashing the input password first. This authentication is basically a time bomb wrapped in spaghetti code!

Content AND REMEMBER: LAWFUL GOOD OK. START THE REIEASI LAWFUL NEUTRAL DON'T MAKE AN THE CLIENT'S LEAVEIT AS IT IS WE WILL CHARGE I AS A FEATURI LAWFUL EVIL I REPLACED THIS SAY WE MAKE NEUTRAL GOOD CHAOTIC GOOD ALL COLORS ARE DECLARED LIKE TEEM, ENES CANBE ANOw, we USeD THE WE'LL NEED 3 DAYS BUTH THE CLIENTT TRUE NEUTRAL CHAOTIC NEUTRAL ...ND THEY TOLD ME WE DECIDED TO STORE THEIR PASSWORDS FIND THE PROBLEN NEUTRAL EVIL CHAOTIC EVIL