The Algorithmic Sacrifice

The evolution of developer laziness in one picture. 2020 devs manually checking every single number like they're counting on their fingers, while 2026 devs just outsource basic math to AI because why bother remembering if numbers are odd or even? The best part? Even Bjarne Stroustrup himself—the literal creator of C++—looked at this and went "Tell me: this is a joke?" Imagine building an entire programming language only to watch future developers ask ChatGPT whether 5 is odd. The man gave us templates, RAII, and the STL, and we repaid him by forgetting modulo operators exist. To be fair, the 2026 approach probably has better error handling than the 2020 version. At least until OpenAI decides that 7 is "spiritually even" or something.

The evolution of random number generation in three acts: Act 1: The naive approach. Just slap rand() % 100 and call it a day. It's like using a rusty spoon to perform surgery—technically it cuts, but yikes. Act 2: The "I read the C++ documentation" approach. Suddenly you're all fancy with std::mt19937 and uniform_int_distribution . You've upgraded from rusty spoon to actual medical equipment. Act 3: The final boss of randomness—international trade tariff tables. Because nothing says "unpredictable sequence" like geopolitical economic policies that change whenever someone important has a bad morning coffee. Next week: Using cryptocurrency market fluctuations as your entropy source.

The C++ programmer's 3 AM nightmare in full display. First the Rust evangelists tell you your beloved language is "unsafe" and you need to switch. Then they warn that all your code will be rewritten in Rust anyway, so prepare for unemployment. Finally, the dream escalates to its horrifying conclusion: "QUIT HAVING FUN" – because how dare you enjoy your pointer arithmetic and manual memory management? It's the programming equivalent of vegans telling meat-eaters they'll die of heart disease while you're just trying to enjoy your steak. Meanwhile, the C++ dev lies awake, haunted by the thought that maybe – just maybe – they should learn Rust before their GitHub contributions become vintage artifacts in the Computer History Museum.

The ultimate punishment for wandering off in a tech store! Nothing says "don't get lost again" like forcing someone to learn pointer arithmetic and memory management without garbage collection. Parents threatening their kids with C programming is basically the modern equivalent of "eat your vegetables or the boogeyman will get you" — except C pointers are actually terrifying. The real horror isn't getting lost; it's trying to debug a segmentation fault at age 8.

Ah yes, the developer's soundtrack. When Spotify Wrapped comes out, normal people share their top pop hits while programmers just have a playlist that perfectly narrates their debugging journey. From "What the F*ck is Happening" to "I Think I'm Going To Kill Myself," with a sprinkle of "Indentation" problems and the classic "ERROR" on repeat. Nothing says "I code for a living" quite like having two instances of "Plus" back-to-back because you're desperately trying to concatenate strings at 3 AM. C programming gets its own dedicated track—appropriately "Untitled & Unfinished," just like that side project you abandoned six months ago.

The pointer gang welcomes newbies with open arms—unless you're dealing with void pointers. While char*, int*, and float* pointers all have their quirks, at least they point to something concrete. But void*? That's the programming equivalent of staring into an existential abyss. It points to... well, anything... or nothing. No type checking, no safety nets, just raw memory addresses and chaos. When a junior asks what type to give the void pointer, the senior's face says it all: "Pick literally anything else unless you want to spend your weekend debugging memory corruption." Ah, the dark arts of C/C++ memory management—where one wrong dereference separates a working program from a segfault nightmare.