Should I tell Her

Listen, when someone questions why you use i and j for loop counters, there's only one valid response: IT'S THE LAW. It's like asking why we drink coffee or hate meetings that could've been emails. Some traditions in programming aren't meant to be questioned—they're sacred knowledge passed down from the ancient CS gods. Using foo and bar as placeholder names, tabs vs spaces, and i , j , k for nested loops... these are the unwritten commandments that separate the true believers from the heretics. Sure, you could use descriptive variable names like index or counter , but then your fellow devs might think you're some kind of revolutionary anarchist. And nobody wants that kind of reputation in the office.

The eternal C++ struggle summed up in one painful exchange. You spend an hour debugging a function that seemingly does nothing, only to realize the horrifying truth - you never actually called it. Just declared it and walked away like it would magically execute itself. The worst part? This happens to 10-year veterans as often as day-one beginners. Nothing quite matches that special feeling of wanting to throw your mechanical keyboard through a window after realizing your carefully crafted game physics engine isn't running because you forgot the parentheses.

Oh. My. GOD. The sheer ARISTOCRACY of C++ developers thinking that 100 nanoseconds is something to brag about! 💅 Honey, that's 0.0000001 seconds. You can't even BLINK that fast, yet here they are strutting around like Victorian nobility who just optimized the queen's favorite algorithm. The AUDACITY! Meanwhile, JavaScript developers are just happy if their website loads before the heat death of the universe. And Python folks? They're over in the corner eating cake with readable code that runs sometime this century. But C++ royalty must have their nanosecond optimization parties. *dramatic hair flip*

When the interviewer asks you to write a loop but you've been optimizing code since the Pentium era. Why waste precious CPU cycles on branch prediction and loop overhead when you can just manually unroll that bad boy? Sure, it looks like you're writing code with your face, but technically you're just doing the compiler's job for it. Modern problems require ancient solutions that haven't been relevant since 1997. Your interviewer is either going to hire you immediately or quietly escort you from the building. No middle ground.

Oh. My. GOD! The C language family drama is giving me LIFE right now! 💅 We've got C# and C++ flanking regular C like it's some kind of programming language family reunion, but honey, one of these is NOT like the others! Plain old C is just SITTING there without any fancy symbols or modern features, practically ANCIENT, while its descendants are flaunting their object-oriented superiority! The audacity! The plain C is clearly the impostor because it doesn't have all those fancy bells and whistles that its children inherited! It's like showing up to a fashion show wearing BEIGE CARGO SHORTS! I can't even!

The sheer audacity of asking ChatGPT to invert a binary tree in C++ while actual developers spent hours debugging pointer nightmares and memory leaks to master this! Tree inversion—flipping all nodes left to right—is that classic algorithm question that separates CS degree holders from Stack Overflow copypasters. Meanwhile, ChatGPT just spits out a perfect implementation without experiencing the character-building trauma of segmentation faults and midnight debugging sessions. The sacrifices we made learning manual memory management weren't just for someone to get the answer in 2 seconds from an AI!