Coding Speed vs Execution Speed: The Eternal Tradeoff

Nothing says "revolutionary leader" quite like deleting those 17 unused classes from your codebase that someone created "just in case we need them later." The crowds cheer! Your git commit is hailed as heroic! The build time decreases by 0.03 seconds! Truly, you've liberated your fellow developers from the tyranny of bloated inheritance hierarchies and half-baked abstractions. Next week's revolution: removing all those interface classes with only one implementation. The people demand freedom from unnecessary indirection!

Oh. My. GOD. The sheer ARISTOCRACY of C++ developers thinking that 100 nanoseconds is something to brag about! 💅 Honey, that's 0.0000001 seconds. You can't even BLINK that fast, yet here they are strutting around like Victorian nobility who just optimized the queen's favorite algorithm. The AUDACITY! Meanwhile, JavaScript developers are just happy if their website loads before the heat death of the universe. And Python folks? They're over in the corner eating cake with readable code that runs sometime this century. But C++ royalty must have their nanosecond optimization parties. *dramatic hair flip*

Someone's job security strategy is absolutely chef's kiss . Instead of writing clean, maintainable code, they've created a function that always returns 2, labeled it as "job security," and then made two helper functions that literally copy memory addresses to change the return value. Nothing says "I'll never be fired" like writing code that only you understand and using memcpy() to overwrite function implementations instead of, you know, just changing the original function. Because why write one line of code when you can write twenty that require a hazmat suit to maintain? Bonus points for the "NEVER call this function" comments that scream "I'm the only one who knows which landmines not to step on." Pure evil genius at work here.

The build tool hierarchy according to C++ developers! BSD Make gets a mild "meh" reaction. GNU Make earns a fancy tuxedo upgrade and approving smile. But NMAKE? That's Microsoft's Windows build tool that makes Pooh show his teeth in pure rage. It's the compiler equivalent of stepping on a LEGO while debugging a memory leak at 3AM. The perfect visual representation of why developers would rather rewrite their entire codebase than deal with Visual Studio's native build system.

The secret to longevity isn't diet or exercise—it's printf debugging! Mike here has made it to 92 by stubbornly refusing to use fancy debuggers or logging frameworks. While the rest of us are stressing over breakpoints and watch variables, he's peacefully inserting print statements like it's 1972. The man has probably typed "printf" more times than he's had hot dinners, and his code is littered with more debug statements than his lawn has blades of grass. Clearly, the fountain of youth flows with C syntax and terminal output. Next time someone suggests you "modernize your debugging approach," just point to Mike—the living proof that printf debugging isn't just a habit, it's a lifestyle choice with unexpected health benefits!

Ah, the infamous donut.c! Non-programmers think we're building fancy holograms and saving the world, but in reality we're spending 14 hours writing ASCII art that renders a spinning torus in the terminal. The absolute peak of C programming isn't creating operating systems—it's crafting mathematically precise donut code that outputs... another donut. It's the programming equivalent of Inception, but with more trigonometry and fewer Leonardo DiCaprios. The real flex isn't that it works, but that someone managed to format the code itself into a donut shape while it generates a donut. That's not just programming—that's art .