If A Binary Tree Wore Pants: The Ultimate CS Fashion Dilemma

Ah yes, the classic "let me solve this simple problem with the most unnecessarily complex solution possible" approach. Two mutually recursive functions to check if a number is even or odd? This has ChatGPT's fingerprints all over it. Meanwhile, every developer with more than 3 brain cells is screaming: return (n % 2 == 0); and calling it a day. This is what happens when you ask AI to "make it elegant" or "optimize this function." You get code that looks impressive in a technical interview but would get you publicly shamed in a code review.

The evolutionary scale of iteration methods, as told by expanding brain memes. For loops? That's entry-level stuff any bootcamp grad can handle. While loops? Slightly more sophisticated, you're starting to think about conditions rather than just counting. Recursion? Now you're cooking with gas—calling a function within itself like some kind of code inception. But map and lambda functions? That's functional programming enlightenment right there. The kind of code that makes junior devs stare blankly while senior devs nod approvingly before muttering "elegant solution" under their breath. Just remember: with great power comes great stack overflow... and I don't mean the website.

Ah, the elegant art of being simultaneously clever and ridiculous. This Python function is the programming equivalent of using a sledgehammer to kill a fly—with style. Instead of the boring old num % 2 == 0 check that peasant programmers use, this galaxy-brain developer created a string "eovdden" and indexes into it using num % 2 as the position, followed by another 2 (which does absolutely nothing). The string is cleverly arranged so position 0 gives "even" and position 1 gives "odd" — making this the most unnecessarily complex even/odd checker in existence. It's like building a Rube Goldberg machine when a light switch would do. And those sunglasses emojis? They know exactly what they've done. Pure chaotic evil masquerading as code.

OH. MY. GOD. This is the most REVOLUTIONARY sorting algorithm of our time! 💀 Who needs bubble sort or quicksort when you can just HALLUCINATE your sorted data?! The audacity of this function to claim O(0) time complexity while literally DELETING your original data and returning a completely made-up sorted list! It's the computational equivalent of "I don't like reality so I'm creating my own." Computer science professors EVERYWHERE are having simultaneous heart attacks. But hey, technically it's the fastest sorting algorithm in existence since it doesn't actually sort ANYTHING! Pure. Evil. Genius.

The perfect visualization of linked lists doesn't exi— Linked lists in a nutshell: a node pointing to another node pointing to yet another node, forming a chain of references where each element only knows about the next one in line. Just like this guy on the phone who doesn't actually have what you need but knows someone who knows someone... Traversing a linked list is basically just following a trail of middlemen until you finally reach the data you wanted 500 pointers ago. O(n) complexity, O(n²) frustration.

When you ask for a 32-bit integer but the judge gives you a signed one. That ~32,768 years sentence is suspiciously close to 2^15, which is exactly what happens when you overflow a signed 16-bit integer. The criminal probably wanted an unsigned int that goes up to 65,535, but instead got the negative range too. Classic rookie mistake. Should've specified the data type in the plea bargain.