You Evaluate, AI Creates

The irony is palpable! A job posting demanding "50% of code must be done by AI" while simultaneously requiring you to sacrifice your firstborn to the startup gods. Let me translate this corporate poetry: "We want cutting-edge AI integration, but also need you in an overpriced SF apartment, grinding weekends away while jet-setting to client sites. Your work-life balance? Sorry, that's not in our Jira board." The "vibe coding experience" requirement is just chef's kiss perfection. Because nothing says "we understand modern development" like demanding both AI automation AND soul-crushing overtime in the same breath.

Asked Copilot to create a simple flexbox layout and it decided to spawn the Inception of div containers. That conditional at the top should've been v-if="canCreateNightmare" . Nothing says "I'm helping" like turning a 3-line layout into the HTML equivalent of a Russian nesting doll. And the best part? All that code just to add the same gap-4 everywhere. Efficiency at its finest!

The ultimate corporate efficiency hack: using AI to simultaneously avoid both writing and reading emails. Left panel: "Generate 2000 words from 'Please submit TPS reports by Friday.'" Right panel: "Summarize this 12-paragraph explanation of why the build failed into 'Jeff broke it.'" Welcome to 2024, where we've automated the most human part of work communication—pretending to care about it.

Turns out we've been doing rubber duck debugging with ChatGPT all along. The sheer act of articulating your problem clearly enough for an AI to understand it forces your brain to actually think through the logic—and boom, solution appears before you even hit send. It's the digital equivalent of walking to your coworker's desk with a question, then figuring it out halfway through explaining it. The irony is chef's kiss: we built advanced AI only to rediscover the power of just thinking out loud.

The classic "Asian parent expectations" trope gets a hilarious AI twist! Dad barging in with "YOU AGI YET?" while his son defends himself with "NO DAD, I'M AN LLM" only to be dismissed with "TALK TO ME WHEN YOU AGI." For the uninitiated: LLMs (Large Language Models) like ChatGPT are impressive but limited, while AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is the holy grail that can think/reason like humans across all domains. It's like comparing a calculator to an actual mathematician. The crushing disappointment in Dad's eyes says it all... "My neighbor's AI is already solving quantum physics and you're still just autocompleting text? Shameful!"

The one thing AI can do that humans can't: admit they're wrong without having an existential crisis first. After 15 years in tech, I've seen senior devs argue for hours defending broken code rather than just say "oops, my bad." Meanwhile, AI is over here like "You caught me! Let me fix that!" with zero ego damage. Maybe the real singularity isn't when machines get smarter than us, but when they get more emotionally mature.