You Evaluate, AI Creates

The modern developer's dilemma in three panels! First panel: Developer with fancy AI tools bragging "My throughput has doubled by harnessing AI." Second panel: Colleague asks "SO YOU'RE SMART NOW?" Third panel: The brutal truth drops - "I'M STUPID FASTER." This is the perfect encapsulation of how we're using cutting-edge tools to accelerate the same flawed logic. It's like upgrading from a bicycle to a Ferrari but still following directions from a broken GPS. Congrats, you're now arriving at the wrong destination in record time!

Ah, the mythical "50-60k lines of AI-generated Python code" beast in the wild! This person has created the software engineering equivalent of Frankenstein's monster and is now realizing that lightning strikes alone can't debug recursive dependency loops. The real comedy is that they've spent months in a "debugging ditch" but still think hiring a human developer is just about "tidying up." That's like saying you need a surgeon to "put a little bandaid" on your self-performed heart transplant. Any developer who takes this job is going to need hazmat gear to wade through 60,000 lines of hallucinated imports and nonsensical variable names. The cleanup bill might exceed the GDP of a small nation!

That's not a white dot, that's Cursor AI sharing your plaintext password file with every hacker on the planet. Nothing says "security professional" like storing credentials in a CSV file named "passwords.csv" and then asking about UI elements while exposing it. Somewhere, a security engineer just felt a disturbance in the force and doesn't know why.

The AI assistant lifecycle in six painful acts. First, AI screams it has the "BEST SOLUTION TO YOUR PROBLEM!" Then you explain "IT IS NOT WORKING." The AI pivots: "OKAY, TRY THIS APPROACH INSTEAD!" But it's "NOT EVEN CLOSE TO WHAT I NEED." The AI proudly declares it "WORKS ON MY DATASET!" before you finally storm off muttering "WILL DO IT MYSELF." It's the modern version of "works on my machine" except now we're gaslighted by a model trained on StackOverflow instead of a coworker who refuses to admit their code is broken. The circle of tech life continues...

That awkward moment when your CTO realizes the legal implications of AI-generated code and suddenly wants attribution. Developers who've been copy-pasting from ChatGPT for months are now sweating profusely. Nothing says "professional software development" quite like frantically ctrl+F-ing through your codebase to figure out which parts you actually wrote versus which parts you prompted an AI to hallucinate. The best part? Nobody actually knows where liability falls, so we're all just adding comments and praying we don't get sued into oblivion.

First half: "AI will destroy all programming jobs! Web dev is dead! DSA and MERN are obsolete! Only learn ML and chase trends! Stop coding!" Plot twist: "The more people panic and abandon ship, the more job security for those of us who know better." Classic fearmongering followed by the actual 4D chess move. Nothing creates better job security than convincing your competition to quit. The tech industry's version of "This beach is totally haunted, you should leave... alone... with all your picnic supplies."