The Void Where AI Code Should Be

The classic Schrodinger's AI paradox! That metronome perfectly captures the bipolar relationship developers have with generative AI. One minute you're watching it hallucinate that Python has a print_slowly() function, the next it's writing a perfectly optimized algorithm you couldn't dream up in a week of Red Bull-fueled coding sessions. The cognitive dissonance is real - simultaneously believing it's both useless garbage AND the technology that's going to automate us all into unemployment. The needle just violently swings between "why did I prompt this thing for 20 minutes when I could've coded it myself in 5?" and "holy recursive function Batman, it just solved my impossible edge case!"

So that's how GPT-5 reasoning works! Just wait 30 milliseconds, print "reasoning complete," and then call GPT-4. Revolutionary stuff. Turns out all those fancy AI companies are just adding a sleep timer and calling it "reasoning." Next they'll tell us AGI is just GPT-4 with a 60-second nap and a cup of virtual coffee. The best part? It's MIT licensed, so we can all pretend to have reasoning capabilities now! Just remember: the key to advanced AI isn't better algorithms—it's better acting .

Microsoft force-feeding developers their AI coding assistant like it's some miracle elixir. Meanwhile, behind the scenes, it's just regurgitating Stack Overflow answers and GitHub repos that developers wrote in the first place. The circle of code life - write code, have it scraped, then pay to have it suggested back to you. Nature is healing.

The irony is so thick you could debug it with a breakpoint. ChatGPT, an AI itself, somehow "lost its job to AI" — which is basically like saying water got replaced by H₂O. It's the digital equivalent of firing yourself and then complaining about it on your LinkedIn. Next up: Google Search engine shocked to discover it's been replaced by "a search engine." The self-awareness circuit must have crashed spectacularly somewhere between training epochs.

Five of these panels show the typical innovation S-curve where technology evolves from primitive (MS-DOS, Internet Explorer) to peak performance (Windows 95, Chrome). Then there's music... where we apparently peaked at Napster and it's been downhill ever since. The real innovation was clearly the ability to download entire discographies without paying a cent. Progress isn't always what corporate overlords want you to believe it is.

Nothing says "I'm helping" like an AI that can't even match parentheses properly. Those unbalanced brackets and braces in Google's Gemini ad are the coding equivalent of nails on a chalkboard. Sure, let the AI write your code—if you enjoy debugging cryptic syntax errors at 2AM while questioning your career choices. "Streamline your workflow" they say... more like "streamline your path to Stack Overflow." The irony of a code-generating tool that can't generate syntactically correct code in its own marketing material is just *chef's kiss*.