Self Sabotage

Ever notice how we've mastered creating 748 different to-do list apps but still haven't figured out flying cars? The tech industry in a nutshell—spending countless hours building yet another CRUD app with authentication while our sci-fi dreams collect dust. Meanwhile, bootcamp grads are busy creating weather apps that tell you it's raining... while you're standing in the rain. The real innovation bottleneck isn't technology—it's developers padding their GitHub profiles with projects nobody asked for instead of building the jetpacks we were promised. Maybe if we redirected the collective brainpower spent on "Uber for dogs" startups, we'd actually have those self-tying shoes from Back to the Future by now.

That moment when it hits you—your entire coding career has been reduced to "vibes" since ChatGPT arrived. No more grinding through Stack Overflow at 3 AM; now it's just "Hey AI, fix this mess" and hoping for the best. Your carefully cultivated programming skills? Just expensive intuition for prompting. Your CS degree? Just fancy paper to frame next to your "I used to write my own code" participation trophy.

Sure, AI can build your app in 5 minutes instead of 5 hours, but have fun debugging that spaghetti junction of code! The left shows a nice, simple railway track—straightforward code built without AI. Clean, predictable, gets you from A to B. The right? That's your AI-generated "masterpiece"—a chaotic mess of intersecting tracks going in seventeen different directions at once. Your app might be built faster, but good luck figuring out which track leads where when everything crashes. It's like asking a hyperactive octopus to organize your closet. Speed isn't everything when you're spending the next month untangling what your AI "helper" thought was a brilliant solution!

The eternal struggle of a desperate coder, captured in one image! On the left, we have LLMs promising to "help with programming questions" but won't actually insult you (how considerate). On the right, StackOverflow boasting it's "accurate" and "used by people who know what they're doing" while flexing knowledge of "even the most obscure languages." It's the perfect illustration of our coding dilemma: get polite, possibly hallucinated answers from an AI that treats you like a fragile child, or brave StackOverflow where your "simple question" will be closed as duplicate, marked as trivial, and someone will suggest you shouldn't be programming at all. Choose your poison!

Oh, the DRAMA of modern coding! 💅 First, you beg Copilot for help like it's some coding messiah. Then you desperately turn to AI, practically on your knees, hoping it'll save your pathetic bug-ridden code. And what do you get? THE MOST INSULTING GARBAGE ANSWER EVER CONCEIVED BY DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE! 😤 It's like asking a chef for cooking tips and they suggest eating the raw chicken because "it looks done enough." Fine then! I'll just fix it myself while dramatically sighing loud enough for my neighbors to hear! The trust issues I've developed with AI assistants will require YEARS of therapy!

When the job description says "R knowledge required, Python mostly used," but then you show up and discover it's 99% R with that one random pandas script someone wrote 3 years ago. The classic bait-and-switch where data scientists get lured by the promise of Python only to find themselves knee-deep in R's cryptic syntax and bizarre indexing. Meanwhile, Python sits there looking all smug because everyone claims to love it, but nobody actually lets you use it for the cool projects.