Watch How I Love To Declare Every Interface

The pedantic programmer strikes again! While normal people casually say "age is just a number," the developer in the room can't help but interrupt with their technically correct but socially oblivious correction. In most programming languages, age would indeed be stored as a string when input from a form before conversion—a fact absolutely nobody asked for or needed to know at that moment. It's the coding equivalent of responding "actually, it's spelled 'you're'" to someone pouring their heart out in a text message.

Content Follow Princioa Consultant Software Architect Team Leader S 30 a Forens S What Are the Greenest Programming Languages: This paper presents a study of the runtime, memory usage, and energy consumotion of twentvseven welcknown sottware lanGuages. We monitor the perormance or such languages using ten cnnerencorograminino problems, expressed in each of the languages. Our results show interesting findings, such as slower faster languages consuming less more energy, and now memo usage marlences enero consumotion. we show now to use ou results to provide software engineers support to decide which language to use when energy efficiency is a concern This study implemented 10 benchmark problems in 27 different programming languages and measure execution time, energy consumption, and peak memo use C is the most efficient programming language, while Python and Perl are the least environmental friendly programming languages Link: https:Inkd.indnyrcdGd engineers programming sottware language energy sustainabilty (c) C (c) Rust (c) C (c) Ada (v) Java (c) Pascal (c) Chapel (v) Lisp (c) Ocaml (c) Fortran (c) Swift (c) Haskell (v) C (c) Go (G) Dart (v) F (i) JavaScript (v) Racket (i) TypeScript (i Hack (i) PHP (y) Erlang (i) Lua (i) Jruby (a) Ruby (i) Python ( Perl Energy 1.00 1.03 1.34 1.70 1.98 2.14 2.18 2.27 2.40 2.52 2.79 3.10 3.14 3.23 3.83 4.13 4.45 7.91 21.50 24.02 29.30 42.23 45.98 46.54 69.91 75.88 79.58 C0 Venkatesh Madi and 4.999 others 397 comments

When someone suggests that programming language choice doesn't matter because "architecture and business" are what really count, they're technically correct but also completely missing the point. Sure, your microservices architecture matters. Sure, meeting business requirements is crucial. But tell that to the developer who just discovered pattern matching and now sees nested if-else statements as a personal attack. The bell curve meme captures this perfectly: the beginners obsess over languages because they don't know better yet. The "enlightened" midwits preach language-agnostic wisdom while secretly still writing Java. And the actual experts? They've tasted the forbidden fruit of modern language features and would rather quit than go back to languages that make them write boilerplate like it's 1999. Pattern matching, exhaustive type checking, algebraic data types—once you've had them, you realize some languages really are just objectively better for your sanity. Architecture matters, sure. But so does not wanting to throw your keyboard through a window every day.

Oh, the sacred archetypes of code warriors! The Paladin with their holy linter crusade (because tabs vs spaces wasn't divisive enough). The Monk crafting artisanal frameworks while typing on a Model M keyboard that sounds like a machine gun. The Sorcerer whose one-liners are so cryptic they might as well be summoning demons—their code works through sheer dark magic until Mercury goes retrograde. The Warlock maintaining COBOL systems from the 1970s, bound by ancient contracts and the souls of retired programmers. And finally, the Bard, whose documentation haikus somehow charm project managers into extending deadlines. The most terrifying part? We all know at least one of each in our dev team. And if you don't... it might be you.

Ah, the classic TypeScript compiler suggesting "tootlips" when you meant "tooltips". Because nothing says "intelligent code assistance" like suggesting a word that sounds like something a drunk person would say while trying to explain dental hygiene. The irony is delicious - TypeScript was created to help catch errors, yet here it is, confidently offering up nonsensical alternatives while your code burns. It's like having a spellchecker that suggests "covfefe" when you type "coffee".

Start with a normal function handshake, end with the ENTIRE CODEBASE being infected with async/await! 😱 The moment you introduce ONE async function into your pristine synchronous paradise, it spreads faster than gossip in a developer Slack channel! Suddenly EVERYTHING needs to be async, your functions are covered in purple Teletubby suits, and your once-simple code is now a hellscape of Promises and .then() chains! The async plague has no cure - resistance is futile! Your beautiful sequential code? MURDERED in cold blood by the async mafia!