Watch How I Love To Declare Every Interface

The bell curve of programming intelligence in its natural habitat. On the left, you've got Python devs thinking duck typing is revolutionary. On the right, assembly wizards who've transcended the mortal concept of types. And in the middle? The poor souls who spent four years learning about strict type systems in CS programs, sweating through every variable declaration like it's a religious ritual. The true galaxy brains are the ones who've gone so far in either direction that they circle back to the same conclusion: "Data types don't matter." Horseshoe theory of programming, folks.

The holy war that never ends. One dev asks if you use camelCase or PascalCase, and the other responds with the only sane answer: following your team's coding conventions. The first guy is basically that colleague who will die on the hill of their personal style preferences while the rest of us just want the codebase to be consistent so we can go home at a reasonable hour.

That villainous grin you see? That's the face of a developer who's about to "modernize" a critical library by replacing simple binary operations with 17 layers of abstraction, five design patterns, and a dependency on three blockchain networks. The best part? Your entire codebase relies on this library, and the migration guide is just a README that says "should be backward compatible" followed by a winky face emoji. The horror isn't that they're reinventing the wheel—it's that they're replacing it with a quantum-levitating hovercraft that requires a PhD to operate and crashes if Mercury is in retrograde.

THE AUDACITY! This code is checking if a user is NOT null, then returning the user... but if the user IS null, it returns null?! WHAT IS EVEN THE POINT?! 💀 It's like putting on a raincoat during a thunderstorm then immediately jumping into a swimming pool. The entire if-statement is so gloriously redundant it deserves its own monument in the Hall of Fame of Unnecessary Code. This is what happens when you're paid by the line instead of functionality. Chef's kiss of inefficiency! Just write return user and call it a day, PLEASE!

TypeScript promises type safety but then gives us the any type - basically a backdoor that lets you smuggle in whatever garbage you want. The cat's horrified expression is every senior dev watching junior devs slap any on everything to make TypeScript errors go away. "TypeScript: JS with syntax for types" *looks inside* "any" - congratulations, you've defeated the entire purpose of using TypeScript in the first place!

Ah, the classic IQ bell curve meme but with programming languages! The folks with average IQ (the middle hump) are obsessing over Rust's algebraic Hindley-Milner type system that's "statically verified at compile time!!!!" Meanwhile, both the low and high IQ programmers (the tails) have reached the same enlightened conclusion: "Types aren't even real." JavaScript and Assembly sitting at opposite ends but somehow agreeing is peak programming wisdom. After 15 years of debugging type errors, you eventually realize it's all just ones and zeros anyway. Why are we fighting over type systems when we could be fighting over tabs vs spaces like civilized people?