Vanilla Javascript Is Deprecated

Content Alex Wang 3rd Data Science Business Algorithms 6d 4 Is your favorite programming language eco-friendly? Follow This interesting idea is actually from a serious paper, which delves into a . ..see more (c) C (c) Rust (c) C (c) Ada (v) Java (c) Pascal (c) Chapel (v) Lisp (c) Ocaml (c) Fortran (c) Swift (c) Haskell (v) C (c) Go (i) Dart (v) F (i) JavaScript (v) Racket (i) TypeScript (i) Hack (i) PHP Energy 1.00 1.03 1.34 1.70 1.98 2.14 2.18 2.27 2.40 2.52 2.79 3.10 3.14 3.23 3.83 4.13 4.45 7.91 21.50 24.02 29.30 19 22

The counter has been reset! The horrified expression says it all—a TypeScript evangelist witnessing the JavaScript framework apocalypse in real-time. That "#1 type safety fan" badge is basically the equivalent of bringing a calculator to a knife fight in the JS ecosystem. Every frontend dev knows the pain of walking into standup and hearing "So I found this cool new framework last night..." Zero days without a new framework is practically the natural state of JavaScript development—it's like trying to build a house while someone keeps changing what "walls" are.

Someone named Devin on the team got fired, and the devs decided to immortalize the moment by removing the @ts-expect-error comment that was basically saying "yeah TypeScript will yell at you here, but trust me bro, it works." The deleted comment is pure gold though: "DEVIN, STOP REMOVING THIS LINE YOU DUMBASS, YES TYPESCRIPT DOES THROW AN ERROR IF YOU DON'T HAVE IT, NO THIS IS NOT 'UNUSED', AND YES YOU HAVE BROKEN OUR CI PIPELINE EVERY TIME YOU DO IT" You can almost feel the rage of whoever wrote that after Devin broke the build for the third time in a week. Poor Devin probably thought they were being helpful by "cleaning up unused code" without understanding what @ts-expect-error actually does. Now that Devin's gone, the comment can finally be removed... because there's no one left to keep removing it. RIP to the CI pipeline's most frequent visitor.

STOP THE MADNESS! React developers have officially lost their minds with this absurd syntax from the "future." The code using use = useUsing("using") is like the JavaScript equivalent of saying "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" but somehow WORSE! 💀 React hooks were already confusing enough with their useState , useEffect , useContext , useReducer , useMemo , useCallback , useRef , and now they're just trolling us with useUsing ?! Is this what we've come to? Next they'll release useUseUsingUsedUses and expect us to keep our sanity!

Content Extreme A Arrays start at 0 e.g: C Statically typed e.g: Rust snakecase variable names e.g: C Current object is self e.g: Rust One number type e.g: TypeScript Garbage-collected e.g: C Objects passed by value e.g: C Tiny standard library e.g: C Extreme B Compromise Arrays start at 1 e.g: Lua Dynamically typed eg: Python camelCase variable names e.g:java Current object is this e.g: C Separate integer and float types e.g: C Manual resource management e.g: C Objects passed by reference e.g: Python Giant standard library e.g: Python Arrays start at 0.5 Changing a variable's type requires calling .changeType () stretchyCamelCase Current obiect is seis "Separate" integer and float types (by name) but they behave the exact same Manually mark resources to be garbage collected Odd arguments by value, even arguments by reference Giant standard library, but it's full of niche stuff and has none of the commonly used stuff

Spent 45 minutes debugging a function that wasn't returning a value, only to realize I never actually called the function in the first place. That moment of realization hits like a ton of bricks—you go from frantically searching for complex bugs to discovering you're the bug. It's like building an entire spaceship and forgetting to press the launch button. The compiler's just sitting there thinking, "I can't believe this human has a CS degree."