Type Shit

The ultimate programmer paradox: !false evaluates to true , but the statement "it's funny because it's true" is itself a boolean expression that's both logically sound and a meta-joke. Seven years into debugging other people's code and I still chuckle at these elementary boolean puns while questioning my life choices. The real joke is that we spend hours hunting down logic errors caused by a single misplaced exclamation mark.

Ah, the sacred art of variable naming. When your brain sees userId , it reads "user ID." But when it sees userid , your inner voice screams "USER-id???" like some confused database goblin. This is the hill many senior devs choose to die on after years of staring at poorly named variables. We'll spend 15 minutes in code review arguing about capitalization but somehow let that 500-line function with no comments slide right through.

Content "Yeah our project uses typescript" look inside any

THE AUDACITY! JavaScript haters have been screaming about its demise for DECADES, and yet here we are, still using it to power 99.9% of the web! The meme absolutely DESTROYS the haters with that savage comeback - "If there were a better substitute, a single language would have been sufficient." BURN! 🔥 Meanwhile, JavaScript is just standing there, arms crossed, absolutely UNBOTHERED while frameworks come and go like seasonal fashion trends. TypeScript, Node.js, React, Vue - they're all just JavaScript wearing different outfits! The language everyone loves to hate but CANNOT LIVE WITHOUT!

The eternal JavaScript ecosystem cycle in three acts: Act 1: "Oh no, I need to convert my perfectly functional JavaScript to TypeScript because the internet says so." *head explodes* Act 2: "Finally finished the TypeScript migration. My code is now bulletproof and I am a superior being." *smug satisfaction* Act 3: "Wait, the internet now says TypeScript is terrible and everyone's going back to JavaScript?" *head re-explodes* The only constant in web development is that whatever you just spent months implementing will be declared obsolete approximately 17 minutes after you finish.

Content Follow Princioa Consultant Software Architect Team Leader S 30 a Forens S What Are the Greenest Programming Languages: This paper presents a study of the runtime, memory usage, and energy consumotion of twentvseven welcknown sottware lanGuages. We monitor the perormance or such languages using ten cnnerencorograminino problems, expressed in each of the languages. Our results show interesting findings, such as slower faster languages consuming less more energy, and now memo usage marlences enero consumotion. we show now to use ou results to provide software engineers support to decide which language to use when energy efficiency is a concern This study implemented 10 benchmark problems in 27 different programming languages and measure execution time, energy consumption, and peak memo use C is the most efficient programming language, while Python and Perl are the least environmental friendly programming languages Link: https:Inkd.indnyrcdGd engineers programming sottware language energy sustainabilty (c) C (c) Rust (c) C (c) Ada (v) Java (c) Pascal (c) Chapel (v) Lisp (c) Ocaml (c) Fortran (c) Swift (c) Haskell (v) C (c) Go (G) Dart (v) F (i) JavaScript (v) Racket (i) TypeScript (i Hack (i) PHP (y) Erlang (i) Lua (i) Jruby (a) Ruby (i) Python ( Perl Energy 1.00 1.03 1.34 1.70 1.98 2.14 2.18 2.27 2.40 2.52 2.79 3.10 3.14 3.23 3.83 4.13 4.45 7.91 21.50 24.02 29.30 42.23 45.98 46.54 69.91 75.88 79.58 C0 Venkatesh Madi and 4.999 others 397 comments