Who Uses TDD Anyway

Content Things I have learnt from this subreddit as a non programmer - Users just do things that they are not supposed to do and It looks like they are purposely trying to break the code. - Legacy code is written and understood only by gods and they only way to convert it into modern code is to fucking write the thing from scratch. - Jobs require ungodly amount of experience. They want a full stack developer EVERY FUCKING TIME. - Senior devs have given up on life and they just do just enough to get their salaries. They work on production just for the thriller. - There is a communication gap between the client and the programmer just because of the fucking management. - You should never work on the main branch and push things to production but its the norm. - Debugging is staring at the code until it works again. - Programmers just copy and paste code. The only real programmers to ever exist are Terry Davis and some random people who maintain libraries that are responsible for doing math on every computer on the planet. - There is just some mystery code in every codebase that appears to do nothing but when removed sets everything in flames. It is usually commented "Don't touch". - If you ask anything on StackOverflow, Its a stupid question. - Sales teams tell the client that the devs can make everything happen even if its computationally impossible. - Its better to take 5 hours solving bugs rather than spend 5 minutes reading the documentation. Programmers don't have lives anyways. - If you are seeking to learn programming learn JavaScript. The next step is to find a new career

Content Hand-writing a set of both normal test cases and edge test cases Assuming the end-user won't do anything too crazy, and only writing normal test cases Creating a program that generates random test cases Hand-writing test cases for the program that randomly generates test cases Writing a program to generate test cases for the program that generates test cases Assuming your code is perfect to begin with, and not writing anv test cases at all

Content - DIJKSTRA LIVESTOCK B

Content SHAKESPEARE QUOTE OF THE DAY An SSL error has occurred and a secure connection to the server cannot be made. ProdrammerHumor.io

Content if messages for massage in messages message.tags 'success' scriptM. toast (fhtmI: " message?" displayLength:2000);script elif message.tags 'info' scriptM. toast(htmI: " message" displayLength:2000);script elif message. tags 'warning scriptM.toast (htmI: "message?" , displayLength: 10000) ;script elif message.tags 'error scriptM. toast (htmI: " message" displayLength:10000);script endif ? endfor endif

The duality of API testing tools is just *chef's kiss*. While normal developers see Postman as a simple wrench to fix API requests, Postman sees itself as the Apple of testing tools – complete with grandiose keynotes and revolutionary features nobody asked for. What started as a humble Chrome extension has evolved into a bloated ecosystem that requires 16GB of RAM just to send a GET request. Meanwhile, developers just want to check if their endpoint returns a 200 OK without having to join a cult. The irony? We're all still using it while complaining about it. Stockholm syndrome for developers.