The QA Engineer's Nightmare Bar

Content Tester waiting for programmers to say sorry for their mistake. ProgrammerHumorio

The perfect visualization of conditional formatting in spreadsheets. One snake sees a purple wall and insists it's pink, while the other swears it changes color when you blink. It's exactly like when you set up those Excel rules that make cells change color based on values, and then your coworker opens the file and goes "why is everything green?" Meanwhile, you're staring at a sea of red cells wondering if you're both looking at the same damn spreadsheet. The turtle is just QA, silently judging everyone's reality.

Content Write code The tests fail Write more tests to narrow down the problem Write tests The tests fail Those tests pass The bug was in the test

Content Why so many bugs in production? e don't design first and code We don't test enough Management gives more importance to timeline than quality fb.meyuva.krishna.memes Red was not the impostor ProdrammerHumor.io

Content SO IN TEST-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT WE WRITE A TEST BEFORE WRITING A NEW FEATURE BUT TESTS USE EXISTING FEATURES, FOR WHICH WE WRITE TESTS. BUT THOSE TESTS USE OTHER FEATURES, FOR WHICH.. I SEE WHERE THIS IS GOING LET'S ASK THE EXPERTS WHAT SHOULD GO FIRST COT CO THE EXPERTS ASK THE EXPERT

Content 252 indentation, paragraph, see paragraph index, 30, 74-76, 150-154, 211-212 index, 74, 212 curly brace in argument, 75 idx file entry written by, 208 in command argument, 153 space around, 169 special character in argument, 75 too many on page, 143 indexentry, 75, 212 on idx file, 208 indexspace, 75 indicator, error, 29, 134 inf (inf), 44 subscript of, 190 infinite loop, 252 infinitely stretchable length, 100, 102, 215 information, moving, 65-77, 207-209 infty (00), 43 ink, rectangular blob of, 106 inproceedings bibliography entry type, 161 ProarammerHumor.io