No Tests, Just Vibes

Content TOP DEFINITION C f S A programming language for Real Men. Most languages try to provide a simplified way to solve specific problems well. C makes no such concession and tries to be mediocre at everything. It lets you program at a very high level, and a very low level in the same program. It lets you write procedural code, object oriented code, generic code and mix them all up. It makes you decide everything and provides no help if you get it wrong. It is by far the biggest, most complicated, ugly, down-right dangerous language you can use. But it does run fast. It takes at least twice as long to program in C as any other major language (except C). The men who program in C are Real Men. The women who program in C are Real Men too. You can spot a C programmer from their testosterone fueled swagger, and the unbelievable amount of contempt they inject into the phrase Java "programmer". They'll probably do the air quotes and all. Dev: 'Hey, Reg, you know C right? What does: "Isrc Cont. spp(52) : error C2679: binary '': no operator found which takes a right- hand operand of type 'int' (or there is no acceptable conversion) C: Program Files Microsoft Visual Studio 8VC include vector(392): could be 'std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc::operator (const std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc)' with TyMain::Cont, Allocstd::allocatorMain::Cont while trying to match the argument list "(std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc, int)' with TyMain::Cont, Allocstd::allocatorMain::Cont " mean?' Reg: 'You missed a semicolon at the end of the line.'

Content Crispy TheCoffeeJesus 24s Code: you have two billion errors V Me: select all, cut, paste Code: you have zero errors Me: GIF

The dark truth no CS professor ever warns you about. Write elegant, maintainable code and you'll be replaced by the next bootcamp grad in 48 hours. Create a tangled nightmare of spaghetti code with zero documentation, and suddenly you've got job security until retirement. The real 10x developer strategy isn't writing more code—it's making yourself unfireable by being the only one who understands the monstrosity you've created. Career hack unlocked!

Faith-based debugging has entered the chat. When your code looks like ancient hieroglyphics and you've exhausted Stack Overflow, Google, and your will to live, there's only one debugging technique left: prayer. This Arabic code snippet with "Inshallah we shall find this bug" is basically every developer at 2:58 PM on Friday when the client needs a fix by 3:00. It's the universal language of "I have no idea what's happening but I refuse to admit defeat." The real bug was the friends we made along the way. 🙏

The classic developer delusion: your code is invincible because it passed some pathetic little tests on your machine. Then reality hits when the CI pipeline runs and suddenly your precious code is getting absolutely demolished by tests in a different environment. It's the programming equivalent of practicing karate moves in your bedroom mirror vs. getting roundhouse kicked in an actual fight. "But it worked on MY machine" - the battle cry of the defeated developer since time immemorial.

Ah, the four horsemen of developer excuses! That moment when your client hits you with the dreaded "it doesn't work" with zero context, and you're suddenly on a game show with no lifelines. The correct answer? All of the above, in rapid succession, followed by asking them to send a screenshot that will inevitably be a photo of their monitor taken with a potato. After 15 years of coding, I've used every single one of these excuses. My personal favorite is "works on my machine" – the programmer's equivalent of "not my problem" but with just enough technical ambiguity to sound legitimate.