Unit testing Memes

Ability To Make Critical Decisions Quickly

9 days ago 218.3K views 0 shares

Developer presents a straightforward test case for calculating the area of a square. Management immediately pivots to TDD philosophy and decides they're actually in the circle business instead. Nothing says "agile decision-making" quite like rejecting a perfectly reasonable test case because your product suddenly doesn't align with the geometric shape you're testing. The presenter is explaining basic unit testing while the executives are having an existential crisis about whether they make software for circles or squares. The real kicker? They're so confident about this completely irrelevant distinction that they're making critical architectural decisions based on... shapes. Tomorrow they'll probably pivot to triangles after the morning standup.

Just Put The Fries In The Bag

Programming Agile Testing

10 days ago 152.3K views 1 shares

You've got the overeager junior dev trying to impress management with massive features, the manager eating it up like it's the next unicorn startup, and the senior dev slowly drowning in existential dread knowing they'll be the one debugging this mess at 2 AM. Meanwhile, underwater where nobody's watching, some software architect is passionately explaining why their elaborate unit test framework is the answer to world peace. Nobody asked, nobody's listening, but they're down there living their best life anyway. The title says it all: sometimes you just want people to do the simple thing instead of overcomplicating everything. But here we are, building enterprise-grade solutions for problems that don't exist while the actual codebase is held together with duct tape and prayer.

Well Well Well

Testing Devops Programming Debugging

26 days ago 266.6K views 0 shares

You know that smug feeling when you tell the team "we don't have time for tests, we'll write them later"? Yeah, later just arrived. Production's on fire, users are screaming, and you're staring at a bug that would've taken 30 seconds to catch with a basic unit test. But hey, you saved what, 10 minutes? Now you get to spend 3 hours debugging at 2 AM on a Friday while your manager CC's the entire engineering org on the incident report. The consequences-of-my-own-actions pipeline is now in full deployment mode. Fun fact: Studies show that fixing bugs in production costs 10-100x more than catching them during development. But sure, skip those tests. What could possibly go wrong?

Always Stress Test Your Candy

C++ Programming Debugging Testing

2 months ago 206.9K views 0 shares

The forbidden Snickers—now with extra pointer problems! Someone replaced the nougat with C++ code that's leaking memory faster than a chocolate bar melts in your pocket. First allocating memory for 10 integers, then immediately orphaning it by reassigning the pointer to new memory, and finally deleting only the second allocation. That first chunk of memory? Gone forever, like your sanity after debugging someone else's code at midnight. The real horror this Halloween isn't ghosts—it's the garbage collector that never comes.

The Lion Sleeps Tonight (In Production)

Testing Agile Programming Debugging

3 months ago 262.4K views 0 shares

The lion may be king of the jungle, but he'd be fired on day one at any tech company. Real developers know that skipping unit tests is like thinking your code works because it compiled once. Sure, you feel powerful now—until that 3 AM production bug when you're frantically debugging while questioning your career choices. The lion's confidence is cute until QA finds what the tests would have caught in minutes. Brave until the first regression!

Yet They Still Don't Work

Testing Programming Debugging Backend

5 months ago 216.5K views 0 shares

Writing unit tests is basically creating a controlled fantasy world where your code magically works. You craft these perfect little scenarios with mock objects and ideal inputs, then proudly declare "See? No bugs here!" Meanwhile, your actual code is in production setting everything on fire. It's like congratulating yourself for winning an argument against an imaginary opponent that you specifically designed to lose.

All Unit Tests Passing

Testing Devops Programming Debugging Backend

5 months ago 284.9K views 1 shares

The sink works perfectly! The water flows through the faucet and... straight into the floor. Classic example of unit testing in software development – each component works flawlessly in isolation, but nobody bothered to check if they actually work together . The plumbing equivalent of "it works on my machine!" Sure, your authentication module passes all tests, but did anyone check if it actually talks to the database? This is why integration testing exists, folks – because passing unit tests is the programming equivalent of participation trophies.

No Seriously, How Did You Fail?

Testing Programming Debugging

5 months ago 203.2K views 0 shares

The AUDACITY of unit tests to fail when you wrote them yourself! 💀 It's like creating your own personal assassin who then turns around and stabs you in the back. You literally MADE these tests, and they have the NERVE to expose your broken code like some sort of digital betrayal. The sheer disrespect! Like, honey, I wrote you from scratch - you should be loyal to ME, not to some abstract concept of "correct functionality." The ultimate toxic relationship in software development - you can't live with them, can't ship without them!

The Art Of Selective Documentation Retention

Testing Security Devops Programming Debugging

5 months ago 297.5K views 0 shares

The Art Of Selective Documentation Retention

The classic corporate security theater in action! One dev tells another to "destroy all sensitive documents" and gets a reassuring "gotcha" in response. But what does our blue-tie hero actually destroy? The unit test report! Because who needs evidence of failing tests when you can just shred the evidence? It's the digital equivalent of sweeping bugs under the rug—except the rug is a paper shredder and the bugs are now "undocumented features." Security compliance: technically achieved.

Born To Code, Forced To Test

Testing Devops Agile Programming Debugging

5 months ago 210.5K views 0 shares

The ABSOLUTE TRAGEDY of software development captured in two cat photos! On the left, the carefree feline living its best life, tail raised in blissful ignorance, eyes WIDE with possibility! On the right? The SAME cat, but its soul has been CRUSHED by the corporate machine forcing it to write unit tests. The light in its eyes? GONE. The playful spirit? VANQUISHED. The transformation from "born to dilly dally" to "forced to write unit tests" is the most DEVASTATING character arc since Darth Vader. This is what happens when management decides code coverage is more important than your will to live!

This Is Why I Have Trust Issues

Testing Devops Agile Programming Debugging

5 months ago 285.1K views 1 shares

Two developers discussing test automation. One says "automate the test cases, exactly as they are written, and only use this dataset." The other nods along until the final panel where they reveal their true plan: "automate the test cases by changing everything the way I see fit and use made up data." That feeling when your coworker agrees to follow the test plan but then goes rogue with their own interpretation. And we wonder why the QA team drinks so heavily.

Please Approve My PR

Testing Devops Git Programming Debugging

5 months ago 232.7K views 0 shares

The classic junior dev power move: "I couldn't figure out why my code was failing the tests, so I just... deleted them." Meanwhile, the senior dev is standing there having an internal blue screen of death moment. It's the software equivalent of removing the smoke detector because it kept going off while you were cooking. Genius solution until the whole codebase catches fire! This is why code reviews exist—to prevent crimes against humanity in your git repository.

Browse