I Dont Even Test

The duality of developers in their natural habitat. While gaming enthusiasts insist that anything below 80fps is basically a slideshow presentation, backend devs are just happy their decade-old codebase still compiles without setting the server room on fire. The fancy Pooh represents all of us who've had to deploy to production on a Friday and whispered those magical words: "If it runs, it's good enough" before immediately turning off Slack notifications for the weekend.

Content Programmer - Translation Guide What Progammers Say What Progammers Mean Horrible hack Horrible hack that I didn't write Temporary workaround Horrible hack that I wrote It's broken There are bugs in your code It has a few issues obscure There are bugs in my code Someone else's code doesn't have comments Self-documenting My code doesn't have comments That's why it's an awesome It's my favorite language and it's really easy to language do something in it You're thinking in the It's my favourite language and it's really hard wrong mindset to do something in it I can read this Perl script I wrote this Perl script I can't read this Perl script I didn't write this Perl script Bad structure Complex structure Someone else's code is badly organised My code is badly organised Bug Out of scope The absence of a feature I like The absence of a feature I don't like Clean solution It works and I understand it We need to rewrite it It works but I don't understand it emacs is better than vi vi is better than emacs It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war IMHO You are wrong Legacy code It works, but no one knows how X Cquit ESCIESCTC I don't know how to quit vi Suboptimal implementation The worst errors ever inflicted on humankind That can't be done It can be done, but it's boring and I don't want to do it No problem, people do this all the time. It's an easy fix. You might be the most idiotic person I've ever encountered Put that bug in the backlog Let's agree nobody ever mentions it again and with low priority ppl who do, will be shot These test environments are too brittle Proof-of-Concept Works on my machine. Have you tried restarting it? What I wrote Perfect solution How Sales Marketing are promoting it

The bell curve of programming wisdom strikes again! We've got the rare intellectual specimens on both ends (14%) who actually write meaningful comments to document their thought process, while the mediocre majority (34% + 34%) proudly proclaim "my code is self-documenting!!" with that smug face we all know too well. It's the perfect illustration of the Dunning-Kruger effect in coding practices. The beginners and masters understand the value of good documentation, while the dangerous middle-grounders think their spaghetti mess speaks for itself. Spoiler alert: Future You will have no idea what Past You was thinking when debugging at 2 AM six months from now.

Content X Error This password is already used by starboy98. Try another. OK starboy98 ProarammerHumor.io

Ah, the classic tale of software development lifecycle. Panel 1: A beautiful, organized tree structure representing clean, modular code. Everyone's happy. Panel 2: The client utters those fatal words about needing a function to do "something in this place." Panel 3: Nuclear explosion. Your pristine architecture doesn't survive first contact with changing requirements. You wrote a masterpiece that handles A through Y perfectly, but the moment someone asks for Z, the whole codebase collapses like a house of cards built by a caffeinated squirrel. And that, kids, is why we drink.

Content In C we don't say "Missing asterisk" we say "error C2664: 'void std::vectorblock,std:allocatorTy :pushback(const block )': cannot convert argument 1 from 'std::Vectoriteratorstd::Vectorv alstd::Simpletypesblock' to 'block and i think that's beautiful