I Salute You My Fallen Soldiers 🫡

The classic security theater of development. Two door handles secured by a padlock that's completely bypassing the actual locking mechanism. Sure, it looks secure to management walking by, much like that code you cobbled together from Stack Overflow snippets without reading a single line of documentation. Is it actually secure? Absolutely not. Will it pass code review? Somehow, yes. Just don't touch it or breathe near it - that's how production incidents are born.

GASP! The AUDACITY of this so-called "developer" claiming ChatGPT and cursor as programming languages! 💀 The poor father's soul just left his body faster than a recursive function without a base case! Look, sweetie, copying and pasting from AI assistants while frantically moving your cursor around doesn't make you a developer - it makes you the human equivalent of a glorified Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V shortcut with delusions of grandeur! No wonder Dad's kicking him out - he probably also thinks HTML is a programming language and Stack Overflow is his personal code repository!

Content DIGITAL BANGLADESI This subreddit An Indian guy from Youtube School Pressing random buttons on my keyboard Stack overflow My Friends Teaching me how to code Schoo

Programmers vs Testers in their natural habitat. The programmer does the bare minimum math and calls it a day. Meanwhile, the tester is over here running through every edge case imaginable—birthdays, death, secret affairs, adoption, and even relativistic time dilation from space travel. This is exactly why we need QA. Your code might work for the happy path, but a good tester will find seventeen ways it could explode in production. And they'll document each one with painful precision while staring directly into your soul.

The English language is basically what happens when you copy-paste code without understanding it. Just like how "-ough" words refuse to follow any consistent pronunciation pattern (through, cough, though, rough, bough), your codebase becomes a linguistic nightmare after the 17th StackOverflow snippet. The compiler somehow makes it work, but nobody—including you—can explain why. It's technical debt with a dictionary.

Content I've interviewed a lot of people over the last year (Java), and my favorite test is to throw a Stack Trace at them and ask them to figure out what the problem is. The answer is actually quite clear, however. Half of them don't know it's called a stack trace. Some don't know what they're looking at (BYE!). Several focus on the wrong section of proprietary code. Some ask to "open a debugger". however the answer is right there in plain english if you just read the method names. Many don't realize the line numbers are RIGHT THERE, and then start focusing on the lines ending with "Compiled Code". Then there are the ones who work their way up from the bottom, starting with the application container code, and lose their minds. Some who figure out what is happening don't have a solution to prevent it from happening. No, I'm not sharing the trace; suffice to say it's been reviewed by more than 5 of my peers and they all passed. Like Reply 1h Edited I mean, it isn't hard to eliminate people with a coding question. Do you find it impossible to teach people how to read text stack traces, or is this a skill without which they will be unable to do anything of use, or do you just not want to hire anyone? 1 am serious. 1 can come up with dozens of useful programming skills I can test a candidate on that most perfectly skilled programmers would fail. Start with eliminating people who can't code at all. Then find out what they can do that could be useful. If I have 5 people who can already take a printed out stack crash dump, I probably don't need another, and if I do, a qualified candidate can be taught that skill by someone who knows it in under a week. Then again, maybe you work for Stack Trace Inc, and your entire job is looking at stack traces. If so, by bad. Like Reply 22m