Having A Website (Or Having Your Credentials Stolen)

The most honest Terms & Conditions dialog in software history. While we blindly check that little box and proceed, this dialog is having none of it. "1208 lines in just a second" is basically calling us all liars, followed by the sadistic 20-minute timeout before you can install. It's the digital equivalent of your mom making you finish your vegetables before dessert, except the vegetables are legalese written by someone who charges $800/hour. Next time just add "firstborn child" to the terms—we'd still click without reading.

Ah, the digital equivalent of pulling the pin on a grenade and hugging it. This beautiful C# method finds every executable file on every drive in your system and launches them simultaneously. Perfect for when you want your computer to experience what it feels like to have a panic attack. The method name "LaunchAllExes" is just so refreshingly honest - like naming your self-destruct button "MakeEverythingExplode". Whoever wrote this probably also keeps their passwords in a file called "definitely_not_passwords.txt".

Ah, the "optimization" that makes security professionals wake up screaming! This tweet is showcasing the database equivalent of putting all your eggs in one extremely flammable basket. Sure, they reduced storage from 100GB to 3GB by centralizing all passwords with foreign key references. But they've also created the ultimate security nightmare - one breach and all passwords are compromised. Not to mention they're enabling password reuse, which is like using "password123" as your bank PIN, email password, and nuclear launch code. That 97GB reduction is going to cost them approximately $10 million in breach notification costs. Such efficiency!

Left side: Regular person confidently declaring they feel "totally safe using Tesla Autopilot." Right side: Programmers who actually wrote the code having an existential crisis because they know exactly what lurks in those if-else statements. Nothing makes you question mortality like knowing the corner cases your code doesn't handle. The same programmers who put "// TODO: Fix this later" in production code are now responsible for keeping your car between the lines.

The classic corporate security theater in action! One dev tells another to "destroy all sensitive documents" and gets a reassuring "gotcha" in response. But what does our blue-tie hero actually destroy? The unit test report! Because who needs evidence of failing tests when you can just shred the evidence? It's the digital equivalent of sweeping bugs under the rug—except the rug is a paper shredder and the bugs are now "undocumented features." Security compliance: technically achieved.

C developers clutching their precious malloc() and free() functions like they're the last chocolate chip cookies on earth! 😱 Meanwhile, Rust is over here with its memory safety guarantees, and C devs are LOSING THEIR MINDS! "What do you MEAN I can't cause undefined behavior and segfaults anymore?! How will I express my ARTISTIC FREEDOM through dangling pointers?!" The sheer AUDACITY of Rust forcing developers to write code that doesn't randomly explode in production! THE HORROR!