I Hate Memory Safe Low Level Languages

This is what happens when a Python dev tries to write Rust without actually learning Rust! The code is a horrifying Frankenstein's monster of Python syntax smuggled into Rust—like that .expect("Failed to read line") that would immediately error out since it's attached to a read operation that already completed. And don't get me started on using match with a dot operator right after! The error handling with Ok(num) => num looks legit until you see that bizarre Err(_) => continue syntax that would make the Rust compiler have an existential crisis. It's basically Python wearing a Rust trenchcoat trying to sneak into the memory-safe club.

The ultimate productivity hack: coding with a side of Subway Surfers and... is that slime in the terminal window? Nothing says "I've perfected my IDE" like turning your workspace into a digital Chuck E. Cheese. Left side: serious Rust code with fancy syntax highlighting. Right side: "Ooh, shiny game!" Middle: "Let me just squeeze in this purple goop ASMR video because why focus on one distraction when you can have three? The compiler errors can wait—I've got a high score to beat and slime to poke.

OMG, someone actually created a programming language to write code for Scratch - you know, that block-based programming tool designed for CHILDREN! 💀 The absolute AUDACITY of creating a text-based compiler with Rust that outputs to Scratch! It's like building a rocket ship to drive to your mailbox! They even had the nerve to add GitHub Copilot support and error detection like it's some kind of serious development environment! Just look at that gorgeous code at the bottom - writing actual text to generate those cute little colorful blocks with the cat mascot. It's the programming equivalent of using a sledgehammer to hang a picture frame! I'm DYING! 😭

Ah, the classic "C/C++ is dead" narrative that's been circulating since approximately the Jurassic period. This meme perfectly captures the eternal resilience of C/C++ despite countless obituaries written by trendy language evangelists. Every few years, some shiny new language comes along promising to be the "C++ killer" - yet there's C/C++, smugly posing next to its own grave, refusing to die. Meanwhile, critical infrastructure, operating systems, game engines, and performance-critical applications are still running on these supposedly "ancient" languages. The smirk says it all: "Nice try, Rust/Go/whatever... I've been declared dead more times than a soap opera villain, and I'm still powering the world while you're trying to figure out your package manager."

The perfect self-burn doesn't exi— Oh wait, here it is! Reddit suggesting r/Rust is "Similar to r/ProgrammerHumor" while someone declares "Goodbye, C++. Rust is the future." is peak irony. The title "Both Subs Are For Jokes" is the chef's kiss - implying that Rust evangelism and programming humor are basically the same thing. Nothing says "I'm a serious developer" like religiously announcing the death of established languages. Memory safety or memory insanity? The line blurs when the Rust cult assembles.

Ah, the Rust evangelism strike force in their natural habitat. Above ground, we have the beautiful C language basking in the sunlight, nurturing an ecosystem that's been thriving for decades. Meanwhile, underground, the Grim Reaper himself is filming a documentary about the angry Rust crab that's convinced everyone C programmers are just one null pointer dereference away from total system collapse. After 20 years in this industry, I've seen this movie before. Some poor C dev is just trying to climb out of the pit while Rust zealots are down there with their memory safety pitchforks and ownership model torches. Sure, my code segfaults occasionally, but at least I don't have to fight the borrow checker at 3 AM while questioning my career choices.