I Hate Memory Safe Low Level Languages

Let's face it—no matter which programming language is your "baby," you're still a card-carrying member of Nerdville. Population: you and everyone else reading this. The only exception? MATLAB users who get the prestigious title of "engineer AND nerd." That extra badge doesn't make your code run any faster though, just means you paid more for your license. And poor FORTRAN devs are just "old and nerd"—like that vintage Star Wars t-shirt you refuse to throw away despite the holes. Still compiling on that machine from 1995, aren't you?

This meme is a hilarious take on the Rust programming language's reputation in the developer community! At the top, we see a beautiful, thriving ecosystem with a C language logo sun shining brightly. Meanwhile, underground there's a dark cave where the Grim Reaper (representing memory safety issues) is filming people worshipping an angry crab with lightning bolts (the Rust mascot/logo). The title "isRustEvil" is playing on the joke that Rust enthusiasts are sometimes viewed as cult-like in their devotion to the language. While C sits above in the established programming world, Rust is portrayed as this underground movement with zealous followers. The meme pokes fun at how some developers view Rust advocates - as if they're part of some strange cult that worships memory safety and ownership principles while demonizing languages like C. The person trying to climb out represents developers trying to escape the "Rust evangelism strike force" that's always telling everyone to rewrite everything in Rust! It's a classic example of programming language tribalism taken to a hilarious extreme. Whether you're a Rust fan or skeptic, you've probably encountered the passionate debates about whether Rust should replace C/C++ in systems programming.

The classic "create your own job security" maneuver. Taking a job where Rust isn't required, then sneakily rewriting a problematic component in your favorite language is the corporate equivalent of moving into someone's house and slowly replacing all their furniture. Before they know it, you're not just living there—you own the place. This is how tech evangelism works in the trenches. No fancy conference talks, just guerrilla warfare: "Oh that critical component that kept breaking? I fixed it... in Rust. Now nobody else can maintain it but me. Checkmate, management." And the 270 upvotes? That's 270 developers who've either done this or are taking notes.

This meme is the perfect cheat sheet for how different programming languages solve problems—and boy, is it accurate! C keeps it simple with a direct approach. Python, being Python, just imports a solver because why reinvent the wheel? Linux users chain together commands like they're assembling IKEA furniture with a Swiss Army knife. Then there's PHP—stuck at "Problem" with no solution in sight. Classic PHP. C++ takes the cake though—creating a new problem with each solution. And C#? Three pricing tiers for essentially the same solution because Microsoft gonna Microsoft. Rust is so obsessed with safety it needs to remind you the solution is rust-approved. And JavaScript? That escalated quickly—one problem fractures into an exponential nightmare of dependency hell. Choose your fighter wisely, folks. Your sanity depends on it.

Rust's borrow checker is like that strict parent who treats their kids differently. If you're coming from C/C++ where you could casually throw pointers around like confetti, the borrow checker gently pats your head: "Oh dear, gorgeous, let me help you avoid those memory leaks." But dare you come from Python or JavaScript thinking you can just assign variables willy-nilly? "YOU DONKEY! WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU'RE TRYING TO USE THIS VARIABLE TWICE?!" Nothing humbles a high-level programmer faster than Rust screaming about ownership while your code refuses to compile for the 47th time.

The bell curve of programming intelligence in its natural habitat. On the left, you've got Python devs thinking duck typing is revolutionary. On the right, assembly wizards who've transcended the mortal concept of types. And in the middle? The poor souls who spent four years learning about strict type systems in CS programs, sweating through every variable declaration like it's a religious ritual. The true galaxy brains are the ones who've gone so far in either direction that they circle back to the same conclusion: "Data types don't matter." Horseshoe theory of programming, folks.