I Hate Memory Safe Low Level Languages

Ah yes, the classic GitHub language breakdown that makes absolutely no sense. Assembly taking up 27.6% of the codebase? Either you've built the next NASA space shuttle or you accidentally committed your node_modules folder and it contained some ancient compiler written by dinosaurs. Meanwhile, Rust sitting at a modest 8.9% is just enough to mention in your job interviews that you're "exploring modern systems programming." The 22.4% "Other" is where all the actual work happens – probably Python scripts that do the real heavy lifting while the Assembly code just sits there looking intimidating.

This meme is pure programming genius! The top panel shows rejection of Rust (a language literally named after metal oxidation), while the bottom panel shows enthusiastic approval of WD-40 (the famous lubricant that prevents... wait for it... RUST). It's basically saying "Why use a programming language designed to prevent memory errors when you can just spray some lubricant on your code?" The irony is delicious - Rust the language prevents memory "rust," but this programmer would rather use the actual anti-rust spray. Whoever made this clearly has commitment issues with learning new languages and would rather apply a quick fix than adopt proper solutions. Classic programmer procrastination at its finest!

The C++ developer dreams of social interaction while the Rust developer's one human encounter per week consists of checking the mailbox and getting told to learn Rust. Introverts who code in Rust don't even make it past the mailbox before retreating back to their memory-safe caves. Five minutes of socialization? Better mark that as unsafe{} and come back next week.

Ah, the Faustian bargain of Rust programming. You surrender your mental wellbeing to the borrow checker gods, and in return, they promise your code won't segfault at 2 AM in production. After 15 years of watching C++ codebases implode spectacularly, I'd make that trade too. The compiler yells at you for eight hours straight until you're questioning your career choices, but hey—no more "undefined behavior" or memory leaks bringing down your servers. It's basically paying therapy bills upfront instead of incident response bills later.

C developers clutching their precious malloc() and free() functions like they're the last chocolate chip cookies on earth! 😱 Meanwhile, Rust is over here with its memory safety guarantees, and C devs are LOSING THEIR MINDS! "What do you MEAN I can't cause undefined behavior and segfaults anymore?! How will I express my ARTISTIC FREEDOM through dangling pointers?!" The sheer AUDACITY of Rust forcing developers to write code that doesn't randomly explode in production! THE HORROR!

Ah, the classic Rust evangelism standoff! Someone dared to mention Rust's compiler prevents bugs, and our hero swooped in with the programming equivalent of "I studied the blade while you studied the compiler." The Rust community has gained a reputation for being the CrossFit enthusiasts of programming—they'll tell you about memory safety before you even finish saying "Hello World." Meanwhile, grizzled veterans clutch their segmentation faults like precious heirlooms, insisting their decades of experience are superior to any compiler guardrails. It's the eternal struggle between "I've been coding C for 20 years and never had a buffer overflow" guy versus "have you heard the good news about our lord and savior, the borrow checker?" crowd.