Average Rust Error

The C++ Olympic gold medalist celebrates victory in the first 5 panels, only to get absolutely destroyed by Rust in the final frame. Classic story of our industry - spend decades mastering pointer arithmetic and manual memory management, then some new language comes along with a borrow checker and suddenly you're obsolete. C++17 promised better memory safety features, but let's be honest - it's like putting a band-aid on a chainsaw wound. Meanwhile Rust sits on the podium smugly preventing segfaults at compile time while every other garbage-collected language watches from second place. Ten years of debugging dangling pointers and suddenly I'm supposed to learn ownership semantics? Fine, I'll update my resume.

The programming language family drama continues! Here we have D (the forgotten language with the red logo) watching as the cool kids C, Go, and Rust hang out at the programming party. Poor D is literally wearing a party hat but nobody remembers it was supposed to be C++'s successor before all these trendy new languages showed up. D actually had garbage collection and modern features before it was cool, but now it's like that uncle who keeps saying "I invented that!" while everyone awkwardly sips their coffee. Meanwhile, Go is getting all the cloud jobs, Rust is being crowned for memory safety, and C just keeps trucking along like the immortal language it is.

The top frame shows mainstream programmers (C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, and Python users) luxuriously lounging on piles of money, blissfully unbothered by memory management concerns. Meanwhile, the bottom frame depicts a Rust developer passionately talking to a brick wall about memory allocation specifics that nobody else cares about. "Yes, I could finish this project in a weekend with Python, but have you considered the memory safety guarantees ?!" Rust programmers: simultaneously the CrossFit vegans of the programming world—can't go five minutes without explaining why their borrow checker is superior to your garbage collector. The rest of us just want to ship code and go home.

Rust evangelists: *screeching intensifies* when they discover 19.11% of Rust libraries use the unsafe keyword, while C++ sits smugly at the dinner table knowing it doesn't need to mark anything as unsafe because everything is potentially unsafe by default. It's like bragging about having 19.11% of your codebase labeled "might explode" while C++ just assumes you're smart enough to know the whole thing is a minefield. Memory safety theater at its finest!

The existential crisis moment when you realize all those fancy programming languages (Ada, F#, Rust, Zig, Swift, C) are just elaborate facades for LLVM! Your entire coding career has been a lie—you've been writing glorified LLVM IR with extra steps. That beautiful syntax you've been obsessing over? Just syntactic sugar before the compiler dragon devours it all and spits out the same machine code. Next you'll tell me my mechanical keyboard is just a fancy input device!

The embedded systems world is having a full-blown affair with C/C++ while giving Rust the cold shoulder. Despite Rust's memory safety guarantees and zero-cost abstractions, embedded devs keep crawling back to their toxic exes C and C++. It's like watching someone choose dial-up when fiber is available because "we've always done it this way." The embedded community's relationship status with C/C++ is definitely: "It's complicated" – and by complicated, I mean "refusing to move on despite all the segfaults and buffer overflows."