Outdated Parent Advice

Forget MM/DD/YYYY vs DD/MM/YYYY debates! Some evil frontend developer decided the best date format is "YYYY/DM/DM" and expects users to calculate their own birthday. It's like telling someone "your birthday is in 1990, now solve for x where x equals the day you were born divided by the month, twice." This is what happens when you let the same person who named variables like temp1 , temp2 , and finalTempIPromise design your forms.

Content Real World datasets Boston house prices ProgrammerHumor.i

Content 0 Keyboard not found Press FI to continue.DEL to enter Setup

Content I SEE A SPREADSHEET FORTUNE ATELLING 3 9-85- AND A LOT OF COLUMNS ProarammerHumor.io I SEE YOU. OUT OF YOUR DEPTH.. JESUS THATS A LOT OF COLUMNS KAPWING

Content How Coffee Works Coffee Code Magic

What we're witnessing here is the legendary Stack Overflow answer that spawned a thousand nightmares. This unhinged masterpiece isn't just explaining why you can't parse HTML with regex—it's having a complete existential breakdown about it. The answer starts reasonably enough before descending into cosmic horror territory with gems like "HTML and regex go together like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide" and "Z̸̯̀A̸̯̿L̸̯̀G̸̯̿Ò̸̯ IS COMING." It's basically the programming equivalent of "don't feed the Mogwai after midnight" except with more eldritch abominations. And honestly? The answer is technically correct. Using regex for HTML parsing is like performing surgery with a chainsaw—theoretically possible but guaranteed to end in tears and therapy sessions.