security Memes

Looks Good To AI Bros Though

Security AI Programming Databases Backend

11 hours ago 159.0K views 0 shares

Oh look, it's the classic SQL injection vulnerability that would make Bobby Tables proud, but with extra steps and worse syntax. The "AI-generated" query is literally concatenating user input directly into a SELECT statement, then somehow trying to GET values from variables that don't exist, AND mixing up assignment operators like it's having an identity crisis. But sure, "vibe coders" who learned from ChatGPT think this is perfectly fine production code. If those kids actually understood parameterized queries, prepared statements, or literally any basic security principle from the last 20 years, they'd realize this is a hacker's wet dream. One simple '; DROP TABLE users;-- and your entire database is toast. The real tragedy? AI code generators will confidently spit out garbage like this, and junior devs who don't know better will ship it straight to prod. Then they'll be shocked when their company makes headlines for a data breach. But hey, at least the code "works" in their local environment! 🎉

When Your Pin Is Stronger Than Your Bank Balance 😂

Security Programming

1 day ago 184.2K views 0 shares

When Your Pin Is Stronger Than Your Bank Balance 😂

Nothing says "junior developer life" quite like having military-grade encryption protecting absolutely nothing. Your account has more layers of security than Fort Knox, complete with 2FA, biometric authentication, and a 4-digit PIN that took you 20 minutes to decide on... all to guard $47.32 and a pending charge from your last coffee-fueled debugging session. The puppy standing protectively over the kitten really captures that energy of "I will defend this with my life" when there's genuinely nothing worth stealing. It's like implementing OAuth2 on your personal blog that gets 3 visitors a month. Sure, it's secure, but who exactly are we keeping out here? Fun fact: Banks spend billions on security infrastructure while most of us are out here protecting our two-digit balances like they're state secrets. At least when hackers breach your account, they'll leave disappointed. That's a different kind of security through obscurity.

Programmers Know The Risks Involved

Security Networking Iot Hardware Programming

1 day ago 146.5K views 1 shares

When you understand how technology actually works, you realize that "smart home" is just a fancy way of saying "200 attack vectors living rent-free in your house." Mechanical locks can't be phished, mechanical windows don't need security patches, and OpenWRT routers are basically the programmer's way of saying "I trust myself more than I trust Cisco." Meanwhile, tech enthusiasts are out here treating their homes like beta testing environments for every IoT device that promises convenience. Voice assistants? That's just always-on microphones with extra steps. Internet-connected thermostats? Because what could possibly go wrong with letting your HVAC join a botnet? The real power move is the 2004 printer with a loaded gun next to it. Because if two decades of dealing with printer drivers has taught us anything, it's that printers are inherently evil and must be dealt with using extreme prejudice. PC LOAD LETTER? More like PC LOAD LEAD.

Gets Phished By It Anyways

Security

2 days ago 200.5K views 1 shares

Ah yes, the mandatory security training that starts with good intentions and somehow evolves into a 4-hour PowerPoint odyssey about password hygiene you learned in 2003. You're nodding along for the first 15 minutes, then suddenly you're on slide 247 about the history of phishing attacks dating back to AOL chatrooms. The real kicker? After sitting through this marathon of "don't click suspicious links" and "verify sender addresses," Karen from accounting still clicks on "URGENT: Your Amazon package needs immediate verification" from [email protected] and compromises the entire company's credentials. Security training is like that gym membership—great start, zero follow-through, and somehow you're worse off than before because now you're overconfident.

Me In 2050

Cloud Security Microsoft Windows

3 days ago 208.8K views 1 shares

The year is 2050. Tech companies have finally achieved their ultimate dream: forcing everyone to authenticate through their cloud services for literally everything. Want to access your own files on your own machine? Sorry buddy, Microsoft/Google/Apple needs to verify your identity first. The UN peacekeepers are here to "help" you migrate to the cloud, but you're having none of it. You've barricaded yourself in your home office, clutching your local user account like it's the last bastion of digital freedom. They can pry your offline credentials from your cold, dead hands. Future historians will call this the Great Local Account Resistance of 2050. Your grandchildren will ask "What was a local user account, grandpa?" and you'll shed a single tear while explaining the ancient times when you could actually own your own computer without needing internet permission to use it.

Twitter Algorithm Github Issue

AI Python StackOverflow Linux Debugging

5 days ago 153.4K views 0 shares

Resurrect Your Old Spare Computer

Linux Networking Security Devops Hardware

5 days ago 143.9K views 0 shares

So you dug that dusty 2009 laptop out of the closet, slapped Linux on it, and suddenly you're running a self-hosted VPN, Pi-hole, and maybe a Nextcloud instance. Your friends think you've gone full tinfoil hat mode, but you're just practicing good OPSEC (operational security) like any reasonable person who's read one too many articles about data brokers. The drill sergeant format is chef's kiss here—because yeah, caring about digital privacy in 2024 shouldn't be some fringe conspiracy theory. It's literally just common sense with extra steps. That old ThinkPad running Debian isn't paranoia; it's called not wanting your smart toaster to know your browsing history. Plus, Linux on old hardware is basically necromancy. That machine was practically e-waste until you gave it a second life as your personal Fort Knox. Windows would've needed 45 minutes just to boot.

The Only Virus I Ever Had Was The One I Paid For

Windows Security Microsoft

5 days ago 207.3K views 0 shares

The Only Virus I Ever Had Was The One I Paid For

Ah yes, the classic tech industry scam: convincing people that their computer needs a $99/year bodyguard when Windows Defender has been sitting there like a perfectly capable bouncer since 2009. McAfee and Norton are basically the digital equivalent of those mall kiosk guys trying to sell you overpriced phone cases—except they slow down your entire system while doing it. The real kicker? These "antivirus" programs hog more resources than actual malware, spam you with notifications, and are harder to uninstall than a Stage 5 Clinger. Meanwhile, Windows Defender quietly does its job without turning your PC into a slideshow. Common sense is still the best antivirus though: don't click on "FREE_IPHONE_WINNER.exe" and you're already ahead of 90% of users.

AWS And Its Complicated Shit Needs To Die

AWS Security Devops Backend Cloud

6 days ago 311.4K views 0 shares

AWS And Its Complicated Shit Needs To Die

You know a system is overengineered when "just authenticate" requires a flowchart that looks like a Rube Goldberg machine designed by someone who hates humanity. Normal auth: hand over credentials, get token, done. Simple. Elegant. Works. AWS IAM: Create a user. No wait, create a policy first. Actually, create a role. Now assume that role. But first, authenticate with an assumed role. Oh, and calculate a quadruple-nested HMAC signature using AWS4, your secret key, a timestamp that better be formatted EXACTLY right (good luck with timezones), the region, the service name, and probably your firstborn's social security number. Then pray you didn't mess up the date format because AWS will reject your request with a cryptic error message at 3 AM. Fun fact: AWS Signature Version 4 requires you to create a "canonical request" by hashing your request, then create a "string to sign" by hashing that hash, then calculate the signature by... you guessed it, more hashing. It's hashes all the way down. Security through obscurity? Nah, security through making developers cry. IAM stands for "I Absolutely Miserable" at this point.

No Privacy For You, Peasant!

Linux Security MacOS Microsoft Windows

6 days ago 288.2K views 1 shares

Linux and macOS users sitting pretty with their encryption keys while Windows folks are out here basically handing their data to Microsoft on a silver platter. The smugness is palpable and honestly? Justified. Nothing says "I value my privacy" quite like choosing an OS that doesn't treat encryption like a suggestion. Meanwhile Windows users are playing 4D chess trying to figure out which telemetry settings actually do something and which ones are just theater. The founding fathers would've run Arch, btw.

Cat Rating Env

Security AI Devops Vim Programming

7 days ago 280.5K views 0 shares

When your cat becomes the lead security auditor for your .env file. Nothing says "production-ready" quite like having your database credentials, API keys, and OpenAI tokens scrutinized by a creature that knocks things off tables for fun. The cat's judging every line: "POSTGRES_PASSWORD=postgres? Really? You're basically begging to get hacked. Also, why are you storing OpenAI keys for file generation, translation, AND hint generation? Pick a lane, human." Meanwhile, there's a tiny crochet developer buddy on the desk providing moral support, because apparently even inanimate objects have better code review skills than most junior devs. The real question is: did the cat approve this environment configuration, or is it about to paw-close vim without saving?

Uber Hiring Security Engineers