oop Memes

I Didn't Get It

6 days ago 174.2K views 0 shares

Oh, the absolute TRAGEDY of encapsulation! Someone made a private Joke object and then had the AUDACITY to provide a public setter method for it. The punchline? You literally can't access the joke directly because it's private, so you genuinely "wouldn't get it." It's a meta-joke about access modifiers that becomes the very thing it describes - an inaccessible joke. The setter is there taunting you like "here, you can SET a new joke, but you'll never GET the original one!" Pure object-oriented poetry wrapped in existential programming humor. Chef's kiss to whoever wrote this because they created a joke that perfectly embodies its own inaccessibility. The irony is *chef's kiss* immaculate.

Order Factory Factory Is Easy To Maintain

Java Programming Backend

9 days ago 220.1K views 0 shares

Order Factory Factory Is Easy To Maintain

Java devs really looked at design patterns and said "you know what? Let's just keep adding layers until nobody knows what's going on anymore." Started with a simple order interface—totally reasonable. Then came the factory pattern because apparently we can't just instantiate objects like normal people. But wait, we need a factory to create our factories! And naturally, the factory interface needs its own factory. Before you know it, you're 17 layers deep in abstraction, your class names are longer than your actual code, and you're trying to convince yourself that AbstractSingletonProxyFactoryBean is "clean" and "maintainable." The clown makeup getting progressively more ridiculous perfectly captures the mental gymnastics required to justify this level of over-engineering. Enterprise Java in a nutshell: where adding three interfaces and two factories to create a single object is considered best practice.

Oop For The Win

Programming Csharp C++ Python Java

13 days ago 418.4K views 0 shares

You know you're doing something right when your entire script is a massive tome of spaghetti code, while your main function is just a tiny pamphlet that says "run everything." Classic procedural programming where you dump 3000 lines into one file and then have a main() that's basically just "yep, do the thing." Meanwhile, OOP developers are over here with their 47 classes, 12 interfaces, 3 abstract factories, and a main function that's somehow even smaller because it just instantiates one god object that does everything anyway. Different approach, same energy. The real joke? Both camps think they're doing it the "right way" while the functional programming folks are laughing in pure functions.

Choose Your Path!

Programming Rust C++ Backend

23 days ago 302.6K views 0 shares

The four horsemen of the programming apocalypse have arrived, and they're all equally insufferable in their own special ways! You've got the Imperative Stoneager who treats modern tools like they're the devil's work and proudly writes software that even cavemen would find outdated. Then there's the Functional Elitist who thinks "monad good" is a complete sentence and writes code on paper because actually running it would be too mainstream. The OOP Boilerplater is living his best life drowning in design patterns and creating class hierarchies so deep they need their own geological survey. Meanwhile, the Safety-Obsessed Newager has written 47 pages of documentation on how to hack an Arduino but his greatest achievement is changing his terminal's color scheme. The real tragedy? They're all using software written by the imperative stoneager because it's the only thing that actually works.

Ignorance Is Bliss

Java Csharp C++ Kotlin Programming

1 month ago 275.7K views 0 shares

Junior devs just slapping public int x; everywhere and living their best life. Then someone introduces them to encapsulation and suddenly they're writing getters and setters like they just discovered fire. The fancy suit represents that false sense of sophistication you get from following OOP principles—until you realize you've written 20 lines of boilerplate just to access a single integer. You're now "professionally" doing what you used to do in one line, and deep down you're questioning every life choice that led you here. Sometimes the simple solution was fine. But now you're in too deep to go back. Welcome to enterprise development, where we make everything unnecessarily complicated and call it "best practices."

I Feel Betrayed

Java Programming

2 months ago 256.5K views 0 shares

Oh, the absolute TREACHERY! You open up Java thinking you're getting some sweet functional programming goodness with lambdas and streams, but SURPRISE—it's still drowning in classes, objects, and inheritance hierarchies like it's 1995. That shocked cat face? That's every developer who thought they could escape OOP hell only to realize that Java's "functional" features are basically just fancy decorations on a very object-oriented cake. You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still gonna oink in Java bytecode, baby.

We Invented Object Oriented Design To Solve A Problem And Then Invented SQL To Unsolve It Again

Databases Programming Backend

2 months ago 337.0K views 0 shares

We Invented Object Oriented Design To Solve A Problem And Then Invented SQL To Unsolve It Again

The eternal irony of software engineering: we spent decades building beautiful OOP abstractions with encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism, only to throw it all away the moment we need to persist data. SQL databases force us to flatten our elegant object hierarchies into normalized tables, then painfully reconstruct them with JOINs. The meme roasts SQL's quirks with surgical precision: case sensitivity that makes you question your life choices, tables that are just "rows of stuff" (goodbye encapsulation), and foreign keys that are basically pointers but worse. The "WHERE LIKE" and "SELECT FROM of it" mockery is chef's kiss—SQL reads like English written by someone who learned programming from a fever dream. Those three CREATE TABLE examples? Pure gold. MySQL's arbitrary constructor order, PostgreSQL declaring types before names (backwards from most languages), and Oracle forgetting strings exist entirely. Each database vendor decided to implement SQL their own special way, creating a fragmentation nightmare. The punchline "Hello I would like INNER JOIN apples please" perfectly captures how unnatural SQL feels compared to object navigation. Instead of customer.orders , you're writing verbose JOIN ceremonies. Object-relational mapping exists precisely because this impedance mismatch is so painful.

Tea And Innit Function

Python Programming

4 months ago 293.6K views 1 shares

The perfect collision of British slang and Python programming! The joke plays on how "__init__" (the special constructor method in Python classes) sounds exactly like a British person saying "innit" - their colloquial way of saying "isn't it?" at the end of sentences. Imagine a posh British dev reviewing code: "Blimey, that's a constructor, __init__? *sips tea aggressively*" The beauty is in how perfectly these worlds overlap - object-oriented programming meets Cockney rhyming slang. Bloody brilliant coding humor!

British Python Devs Be Like

Python Programming

4 months ago 242.6K views 0 shares

Ah, the British pronunciation of "__init__" is the real star here. While American devs just say "dunder init" and move on, British devs are asking for proper identification papers with that questioning tone. "That's a constructor, __init__?" sounds exactly like "That's a constructor, innit?" — the quintessential British slang for "isn't it?" Bloody brilliant wordplay that works precisely because Python's constructor method looks like someone trying to emphasize the word "init" with underscores. Cheerio, old chap.

The Business Engineering Betrayal

Programming Java Debugging

5 months ago 304.7K views 0 shares

The AUDACITY of business engineering programs! 😤 First they LURE you in with fancy business talk, then SURPRISE! Programming lectures appear out of NOWHERE! You start getting excited about Java and OOP like "Ooh, I'm a real programmer now!" Then BAM! 💥 They hit you with the ULTIMATE BETRAYAL - coding ON PAPER! No compiler, no autocomplete, just you and your PATHETIC human memory trying to remember if semicolons go at the end of every line. The CRUELTY is simply BEYOND COMPREHENSION! It's like being taught to swim and then being tested in a desert. DIABOLICAL!

Make Your Own Joke

Java Csharp C++ Programming

5 months ago 314.4K views 0 shares

Look at this beautiful encapsulation—a private joke that can only be accessed through a setter method. And just like real programmer humor, if you need it explained, "you wouldn't get it." The irony is perfect: a class called Meme with a private Joke that needs to be set explicitly, much like how the best programming jokes require insider knowledge that can't be easily transferred. The Joker knows what's up—some jokes just don't compile in everyone's mental runtime.

Inheritance: The Ultimate Design Pattern For Wealth

Programming Csharp Python Java

5 months ago 305.8K views 2 shares

Inheritance: The Ultimate Design Pattern For Wealth

The perfect double entendre doesn't exi— In programming, inheritance lets a class acquire properties from a parent class. In real life, inheritance lets you acquire properties from your parents. Coincidence? I think not. The fastest way to build wealth is apparently the same whether you're writing Java or living in society - just extend the right class.

Browse