The Era Of Linux Gaming

Content Jamie Cohen NewandDigital I like how this enthusiastic young woman with a fourth grade education thinks she's going to look at thousands of lines of code and be like thank you m'lord elon for your transparency I understand now Tomi Lahren TomiLahren Expose the algorithms, elonmusk ALL of them!!! 9:26 PM 102722 Twitter for iPhone 6:25 AM 102822 Twitter for iPhone

Content When the client asks if you can do it for cheaper...

Content Ch SOURCE CONTROL Y SOURCE CONTROL E V 9 U Remove the chicken from the oven and let it rest for 5 minutes before serving. Serve with the pan juices and the lemon wedges. Commit Changes tests component y La interaction home HealthMenuToast.tsx V render header HealthMenu.tsx y La unit common is featureFlags.ts M M M ion... M HealthMenu.tsx src components home g 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 const HealthMent children, isInitialising : HealthMenuToe const global const globalIr const currentF const currentf const property propertyId: gLobalinfo, Di const isAdmin const isShowir

Content SELECT DISTINCT

Content - ballbase 72 points 1 day ago What does sacrifice child mean in this context? permalink source embed save save-RES report give award reply hide child comments -J Schnickatavick 234 points 1 day ago (last edited 1 day ago) I don't know the term "sacrifice", but generally killing a child means that a parent process needs to terminate a secondary (child) process that it started. I would assume based on context that a sacrifice is just ending a child process to save memory? Regardless, threading has some of the most messed up terminology for seemingly no reason. It's the only place where "killing orphans" or "zombie children" are normal terms permalink source embed save save-Res parent report give award reply hide child comments - TechCubeTetrabyte us 61 points 1 day ago Zombie children? Like, unaccounted for by the OS? permalink source embed save save-RES parent report give award reply hide child comments - Schnickatavick 128 points 1 day ago - It's a child process that finished its task and closed, but the parent process hasn't acknowledged it yet. It leaves it in this awkward state where it's terminated (dead) but it still has to hang around in memory (like a zombie) until the parent process can receive the child's "return" values, which let's the OS wipe it from memory, which is called reaping. Which is another messed up term, the OS is literally a "reaper" for dead processes? Who named this stuff? permalink source embed save saveRES parent report give award reply hide child comments - TerrorBite 55 points 1 day ago - The child itself has already died or been killed at that point; what isn't released yet is the child's entry in the PID table, as the return code (which the parent needs to read) needs to be stored somewhere. So the only thing the zombie process is taking up at that point, is a PID number and a few kB at most of metadata in the kernel. You can't kill a zombie process, because it's already dead. The only way to get rid of it is to kill the lazy parent; the zombie will then be re-parented to init, which will clean it up immediately. Dermalink source embed unsave parent report give award reply hide child comments - Schnickatavick 69 points 1 day ago The only way to get rid of it is to kill the lazy parent The child itself has already died or been killed the zombie will then be re-parented See! What's with this phrasing?! But yeah, that's exactly right Dermalink source embed unsave parent report oive award rediv nice child comments

Content In case of fire 1. git commit E 2. git push ha 3. leave building ProdrammerHumor.io