The Ultimate Developer Dress Code

Content Kitze thekitze "Sooo I'm working on my new startup, it's going great so far" React App localhost:3000 Hello World 8:21 AM 18 Dec 17 146 Retweets 642 Likes

Content Rishabh Jain 3rd PERSONAL branding I Meme Marketer ... 1W Why JavaScript.?? Just because of that: javascript computerscience linkedingrowth Follow Why Javascript JavaScript Machine Learning Desktop Apps Mobile Apps FrontEnd BackEnd ProarammerHumor.io

Content BACK VOCALIST Gets a fraction of frontman's paycheck Can't take a break during work hours Drinks to forget old memories from work Has to work in synch with frontman Noone will probably notice your mistake BACKENDER Gets roughly the same pay as frontender Seems like he's always on a break drinking coffee Drinks with sysadmin to aquaire old memories from work Can work both synchronous and asynchronous 500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR

The ultimate punishment isn't solitary confinement—it's forced JavaScript training! Finnish prison rehabilitation just got real with the judge sentencing criminals to two years of callback hell, prototype inheritance, and "undefined is not a function" errors. The prisoner's face says it all: that moment when you realize your crime only warranted a misdemeanor but somehow you're getting punished with learning hoisting and closures. At least in regular prison you just break rocks instead of trying to figure out why this keeps changing context. The real torture? Waiting for npm packages to install on prison wifi.

Content Dhanush N DhanushXen HTML - for structure CSS - for style Javascript - for fun React - for work C - for dinosaurs C-for college Swift - for UI Ruby - for rails Query - for legacy Python - for science Typescript - for safety Java - for 3 billion devices 8:29 AM 02 Jul 21 ZIappo.com 603 Retweets 58 Quote Tweets 3,062 Likes 17 ProdrammerHumor.io

Ah, the classic StackOverflow NaN test debate! Someone wrote a beautifully elegant isNaN() function that simply checks if a number isn't equal to itself ( num != num ), which is actually brilliant because that's the only time equality fails in JavaScript/Python. But then some principled developer comes along and declares it "prohibited witchcraft" despite admitting it works perfectly. This is coding purity culture at its finest. "Yes, your three-line solution works flawlessly, but I'm morally obligated to insist you use the official 50-line implementation with seventeen edge cases instead." The real witchcraft is how StackOverflow manages to turn elegant solutions into religious debates since 2009.