JavaScript (Or Java) Is Definitely Not The Same Thing

Content .AND HERE IS OUR DATA LAKE IT LOOKS REALLY WELL STRUCTURED YEAH, NO WORRIES DO YOLI THINK YOU CAN HANDLE IT? locations m price: SOL TABLE products ordersfinal.xlsx X FOLLOW TDDCOMICS ON fIS

When the product manager proudly announces support for 86-inch displays while the frontend devs are sweating bullets trying to figure out how to make that responsive layout not explode. Nothing quite captures the silent horror of realizing your carefully crafted CSS is about to be stretched across a display the size of a small country. The PM's excitement is directly proportional to the developer's existential dread. Meanwhile, somewhere in the codebase: max-width: 1200px; /* nobody will ever need more than this */

Frontend developers just collectively shuddered at this monstrosity. That circular screen is basically saying "Have fun making your responsive designs work on THIS, suckers!" It's like someone looked at the rectangular screens we've been optimizing for decades and thought, "You know what would be fun? Geometry warfare!" Imagine the CSS nightmares. Your perfectly crafted grid layout? Dead. Your meticulously positioned elements? Homeless. Your sanity? Gone. The corners don't even exist anymore! Where do notifications go? Into the void, apparently. The person asking for ONE reason not to buy it clearly hasn't spent hours debugging why their div is 1px off. Meanwhile, frontend devs are already updating their resumes with "survived circular viewport trauma" as a skill.

Content Me Yelling at Computer: Why won't this work? It isn't that hard! The computer, doing what its told: The IDE that thought the unused variable was more important: The backend dev wondering why O am hard- coding ISON Objects: The missing semicolon: I'm about to end this man's whole career Users who made their own operating systems and StackOverflow users who dont postanswers: Signature look of superiority. former Pathetic. The compiler after hearing me say I will quit programming if this doesn't work: Doubt Made with GIMP

Content 0 "g" true JS true JS So, if 9 . "g" and 0 es then surely "O" That makes sense to me. false

Content lbaum oscherler JavaScript makes me want to flip the table and say "Fuck this shit", but can never be sure what "this" refers to. 7:03 AM Oct 30, 2015 Twitterrific for Mac 1.2K Retweets 1.3K Likes 17