Bruh Just Lemme Download The SDK

Nothing ends a potential romance faster than saying "Java is better than Python." That's not a programming preference—that's a relationship dealbreaker. The Python vs Java debate has ruined more potential connections than bad WiFi at a developer conference. At least buy them coffee first before dropping such controversial opinions.

Content imgilip.cor NODES WAS MADE SO FRONT END DEVS COULD CLAIM TO BE FULL STACK. CHANGE MY MIND

Content T045TBROT t045tbrOt finally, a monitor that will fit the entire name of my Java classes MSUNG 10032018, 01:57 5.467 Retweets 15,3K Likes 17 T045TBROT t045tbrOt 1d not C template errors tho 1

Content Should you use java? Are you building android apps? Yes Please stop, use Kotlin! No No

Content PROBLEM: JAVASCRIPT HAS ALMOST NO STANDARD LIBRARY SOLUTION: THOUSANDS OF COMMUNITY -SUPPORTED LIBRARIES OF WILDLY VARYING QUALITY PROBLEM: JAVASCRIPT HAS NO PACKAGING OR A LINKER TO TIE THESE PACKAGES TOGETHER PROBLEM: JAVASCRIPT WON'T RUN OUTSIDE THE BROWSER SOLUTION: V8 PROBLEM: JAVASCRIPT IS SINGLE -THREAD BY DESIGN SOLUTION: ASYNCHRONOUS PROGRAMMING, NODE. JS PROBLEM: CALLBACK HELL PROBLEM: PROTOTYPAL INHERITANCE IS PANTS -ON- HEAD STUPID THAT'S RIGHT, I SAID IT. PROBLEM: WEB RESOURCES NEED TO BE MINIFIED AND ZIPPED FOR PERFORMANCE PROBLEM: THE DOM IS TOO SLOW FOR VIDEO GAMES SOLUTION: CANVAS PROBLEM: JAVASCRIPT IS TOO SLOW FOR VIDEO GAMES SOLUTION: USE AN ASSEMBLY- LIKE SUBSET OF JAVASCRIPT CALLED ASM.JS PROBLEM: ASM.JS IS BASICALLY UNWRITABLE 4 HUMANS. SOLUTION: COMPILE A BETTER LANGUAGE TO JAVASCRIPT (C, EMASCRIPT 2016, COFFEESCRIPT, JSX) SOLUTION: HUNDREDS OF COMMUNITY SUPPORTED BUILD TOOLS OF WILDLY VARYING QUALITY PROBLEM: GRUNT. SOLUTION: GULP PROBLEM: GULP PROBLEM: MACHINE GENERATED OUTPUT IS MORE DIFFICULT TO DEBUG PROBLEM: ASYNC IS STILL A NIGHTMARE, HUH? PROBLEM: BALLOONING PROJECT SIZE AND COMPLEXITY PROBLEM: JAVASCRIPT STILL DOESN'T DO EVERYTHING PROBLEM: OUTPUT RUNS VERY SLOWLY ON MOBILE DEVICES SOLUTION: ELECTRON, PHONEGAP, FIREFOXOS HOW IS DIGGING GOING TO GET US OUT OF THIS HOLE? WHERE I AM FROM, THE POINT OF DIGGING IS NOT FREEDOM FROM DIGGING

That moment when you're trying to loop through an Iterator in Java and the compiler just sits there judging you like this capybara. The compiler's basically saying "Sorry buddy, you can't use a for-each loop on an Iterator because... well... an Iterator IS the thing that lets you iterate!" It's like trying to drive a car factory instead of driving the actual car it produces. The worst part? Deep down you know the compiler is right, but that doesn't make the error message any less painful. You'll have to use a while(hasNext()) loop like a caveman instead.