The Three Stages Of Code Resumption

Ah, the classic programming trivia game that's trolling newbies! The answer is obviously "Hello, world" (highlighted in green), but the joke's in the other options. "Git gud" is both a gaming taunt AND a version control pun. "Download Linux" is what every Stack Overflow answer suggests when you have a Windows problem. And "Error 404" is what your career becomes after forgetting a semicolon. The title "Git Gud" is extra spicy because it's telling beginners they need to master Git (arguably more terrifying than any algorithm).

The moment of horrifying realization when you mock someone else's terrible code only to discover you wrote it six months ago. That slow transition from smug superiority to existential crisis hits differently when Git blame points back at your own username. Nothing quite like the taste of your own spaghetti code to humble you before lunchtime.

SWEET MERCIFUL CODE GODS! The most powerful entity in software development isn't your tech lead—it's that desperate little feline begging for your approval! While you're drowning in 47 Jira tickets, this adorable catastrophe is just waiting for someone, ANYONE, to merge their changes into the sacred main branch. The sheer DRAMA of waiting for code review approval has literally transformed this developer into a pleading kitten. And honestly? Same. Nothing says "I've lost all dignity" quite like peeking over a chair asking for your pull request to be approved after you've spent three days refactoring that nightmare function everyone was too scared to touch! 🙀

Junior developers pushing code straight to production is the tech equivalent of giving car keys to someone who just got their learner's permit. The terrifying confidence of asking "How much review do I need?" only to immediately decide "None? I merge now. Good luck, everybody else!" perfectly captures that moment when inexperience meets fatal optimism. Senior devs watching this unfold are already updating their resumes while the production server starts smoking. That merge button might as well be labeled "Career Russian Roulette."

The D&D alignment chart for Git branch naming conventions is painfully accurate. Your team's choice reveals everything about your codebase's true nature. Calling it "main" means you follow best practices and probably have documentation. "Stable" folks are pragmatic but boring. Meanwhile, "rolling" users are one failed test away from disaster but somehow it always works. The chaotic evil "mommy" branch? That's the team that also has a "daddy" branch for hotfixes and wonders why HR keeps calling them.

Ah, the classic code review battlefield! 🔥 Nothing triggers a developer's fight-or-flight response faster than hearing "Your code will work but I don't like the way it is implemented." It's like telling someone their baby is ugly but functional. 😂 We've all been there - spent hours crafting what we think is a masterpiece, only for some senior dev to casually suggest a "small refactor" that invalidates your entire approach. The code passes all tests? Runs perfectly? Doesn't matter! It's not elegant enough for their refined taste buds. This is basically the programming equivalent of starting a bar fight. Keyboards will fly, Stack Overflow links will be weaponized, and someone's going to end up crying into their mechanical keyboard at 2am while rewriting everything.