Merging Two Branches After Long Time

OMG, the AUDACITY of this person! 💀 They're literally looking at a GitHub repository—you know, the ENTIRE SOURCE CODE—and still asking "where's the exe file?" Honey, GitHub isn't the Windows 95 CD-ROM your grandma installed Minesweeper from! It's like walking into a bakery, seeing all the ingredients and recipes on display, and asking "where's my cake?" YOU HAVE TO BAKE IT YOURSELF, SWEETIE! This is why developers drink...

The Noah's Ark of code sources! At the top, we've got the majestic elephant (StackOverflow) carrying us through floods of bugs, the wise but dusty Documentation nobody reads, the giraffe (YouTube tutorials) stretching the truth but somehow working, GitHub code that's supposedly "production-ready," and the professor's theoretical perfection that falls apart in real life. Then there's your friend's code (which you secretly judge while copying), and your actual code (that embarrassing mess you hide from the world). But when the client shows up? Suddenly you're presenting that bizarre hybrid monstrosity—a chimera of StackOverflow answers, YouTube hacks, and panic-induced workarounds that somehow functions. And the client stares at your Frankenstein creation thinking "what the hell is this?" The true engineering skill isn't writing perfect code—it's making your abomination look intentional during the demo.

GitHub's password deprecation strategy is like a villain in a noir film. "Please enter your password... ah yes, thank you. By the way, passwords are dead to me now. Generate a token instead." The classic bait-and-switch executed with all the subtlety of a ransomware notification. Nothing says "we care about security" quite like making you use an outdated authentication method before telling you it's outdated.

Education: "Plagiarism is unacceptable!" Professional programmers: "Hey, I stole your code." "It's not my code." The software industry runs on an elaborate honor system where we pretend we're all brilliant architects while frantically copy-pasting from Stack Overflow with one hand and GitHub with the other. The modern developer's workflow is essentially: Google the error, find someone who solved it 7 years ago, adapt their solution, and convince yourself you would've eventually figured it out anyway. Standing on the shoulders of giants? More like piggybacking on strangers' brilliance while muttering "I totally knew that" under your breath.

Two people bond over their shared love of coding, but once you peek under the hood, it's a completely different tech stack civil war. One side's rocking Python, VS Code, Git, and Docker like a sensible human being. The other's got... whatever chaotic combination of Deep Learning frameworks, package managers, and tools that probably requires three different terminal windows just to compile "Hello World." It's the developer equivalent of saying "I love pizza" and then finding out one person means authentic Neapolitan margherita and the other means pineapple with ranch dressing. Sure, you both "love coding," but good luck pair programming without starting a holy war over tooling choices.

Someone just reinvented Git while lamenting 4 months of lost work. It's like watching someone suggest we should invent the wheel right after their cart broke down. The real horror isn't the lost code—it's realizing there's an entire generation of developers who think "version control" is just hitting Ctrl+S more aggressively when things get scary. Pro tip: If your deployment strategy is "pray nothing breaks," you're gonna have a bad time.