Don't Do It Jarvis

Ah, the sacred art of commit messages. The sign demands "Commit messages must contain actual information" while the developer mutters "If those kids could read they'd be very upset." Nothing quite captures the essence of developer rebellion like pushing code with messages like "fixed stuff," "it works now," and the ever-popular "some bug fixes." Sure, future-you will have absolutely no idea what changes were made or why, but present-you saved a whole 15 seconds not documenting properly. Brilliant strategy!

That moment when you realize his "private" repos are just abandoned side projects and half-baked ideas with commit messages like "fix stuff" and "it works now???" Showing someone your private GitHub repos is the developer equivalent of letting them see your search history—equal parts terrifying and disappointing. Those repos are where good ideas go to die and where code standards don't apply. It's not scandalous, just sad.

The coding journey in one perfect image! Your code is basically a weird Frankenstein's monster stitched together from three different sources: some obscure blog post you found at 2 AM (the kangaroo), a GitHub repo you don't fully understand but somehow works (the wild dog), and the lifesaving snippets from Stack Overflow that actually make the whole thing run (the rat). The result? That strange hybrid creature at the bottom that shouldn't logically exist but somehow gets the job done during code review. Ship it anyway!

Ah, the ancient hieroglyphics of code written before the holiday break. You stare at it like an archaeologist trying to decipher a dead language. "Who wrote this?" you wonder, before checking git blame and realizing it was you... three weeks ago. The coffee isn't strong enough for this level of amnesia. Your brain has completely purged all context about what the hell you were thinking when you wrote that nested ternary operator. Just approve it and type "LGTM" (Looks Good To Me), because honestly, who even remembers how this codebase works anymore?

Ah, the classic "end user meets GitHub" scenario! 😂 This poor soul wandered into the sacred lands of repositories expecting a simple download button, only to be greeted by the arcane scrolls of source code. It's like watching someone walk into a bakery and scream "WHY IS THERE FLOUR EVERYWHERE? JUST GIVE ME A CAKE!" The beautiful collision between non-technical users and developer platforms is pure chaos energy. Developers are sitting there like "but... but... the code IS the point..." while this person is having an existential meltdown over not finding an .exe file. The post being locked is the digital equivalent of "Sir, this is a Wendy's."

Finally, a Git tutorial that makes sense! The landing plane is git commit - safely touching down with your changes. The takeoff is git push - launching your code into the remote repo with a prayer it doesn't crash. And git add ? That's just people desperately climbing onto a sketchy ladder in the middle of nowhere - exactly how it feels tracking files before you've figured out what half of them even do. Ryanair's budget operations perfectly capture the bare-minimum approach most of us take with version control. "Yeah, I'll just commit directly to main. What could possibly go wrong?"