Born In The Wrong Branch

OH. MY. GOD. The ABSOLUTE PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE of code reviews! 💀 You pour your ENTIRE SOUL into a PR, and what do you get? Either a million "Overwhelmingly Positive" comments that make you question if they even READ your code, or that ONE devastating "Not Recommended" with ZERO explanation that haunts you for ETERNITY! And the SILENCE? That's the worst! Like, just TELL ME what's wrong with my beautiful 3 AM creation instead of leaving me to SPIRAL into self-doubt! Is it my variable naming? My architecture? MY ENTIRE CAREER CHOICE?! The duality of feedback is sending me to an early grave, I swear. 🪦

The wildest git diff indeed! Someone caught Mozilla red-handed removing Firefox's promise to never sell user data. On the left side, Firefox boldly declares "Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That's a promise." But in the updated version? *Poof* – that entire answer just vanished into thin air. Nothing says "trust us with your data" quite like silently deleting your promise not to sell it. And they wonder why alternative browsers like Waterfox and Librewolf are gaining popularity. The irony of this happening while the FAQ still includes "Why is Firefox so slow?" is just *chef's kiss*.

Oh, the delicious irony! A team decides to DITCH AI coding assistants because reviewing AI-generated code is somehow MORE painful than just writing the damn thing yourself. It's like hiring a chef who makes you spend three hours fixing their burnt soufflé instead of just making a sandwich. But wait, there's MORE! The plot twist? Our hero here accidentally became a top 50 Devin user globally and is now pumping out 60 PRs a day. That's right—they complained about AI code being hard to review and then proceeded to become an AI code-generating MACHINE. The call is coming from inside the house! It's like saying "I hate fast food" while secretly working the drive-thru at three different McDonald's locations. The beautiful chaos of 2025: where we simultaneously hate AI coding tools AND can't stop using them. Pick a struggle, people! 🎭

The year is 2070. Flying cars exist. We've colonized Mars. Quantum computing powers everything. But the Linux kernel? Still not "vibe code." Some poor maintainer is getting a pull request rejected because Linus doesn't think their commit messages spark joy. 50 years from now and we'll still be using git, still dealing with legacy code from the 90s, and still arguing about tabs vs spaces. The more technology advances, the more kernel development stays exactly the same.

Bragging about 10k lines of code per day is like bragging about eating 47 hot dogs in one sitting. Sure, it's technically impressive, but everyone knows you're going to regret it later. When 35% of those lines are tests, you're really just admitting you write 6,500 lines of actual code without anyone checking if it works first. No code review, no pair programming, just raw unfiltered chaos being committed straight to main. The real question isn't about regression bugs—it's about when the entire codebase achieves sentience and decides to quit.

Ah, Git. The tool we all praise in public and curse in private. The first panel is that classic tech presentation where someone's overselling Git with buzzwords like "distributed graph theory tree model" – as if that helps anyone understand it. Then comes the brutal truth bomb: nobody actually understands Git. We just memorize arcane incantations, pray they work, and when they inevitably fail, we resort to the time-honored tradition of nuking the repo and starting fresh. Twenty years in the industry and I still sometimes find myself thinking "git add, git commit, git push" and if that doesn't work... well, there's always rm -rf and clone again. Some tools you use; Git uses you.