Born In The Wrong Branch

That moment when a departing dev becomes the most dangerous person in the company. The two-weeks-notice developer suddenly transforms from "just another coder" to "possessor of all corporate secrets" in management's eyes. Companies panic like they've just realized their entire codebase is now a hostage situation. Meanwhile, the dev is thinking "You ignored my code reviews for 3 years, but now you're worried about what I know?" Pro tip: If your entire business collapses because one developer leaves with source code knowledge, your problem isn't the developer—it's your nonexistent documentation.

The ultimate developer escape hatch has arrived! Some genius created a GitHub repo called "git-blame-someone-else" with 11k stars and counting. It's basically the digital equivalent of writing "not my fault" in your commit messages, but automated. The repo description says it all: "Blame someone else for your bad code." Finally, a way to attribute those questionable 3 AM coding decisions to your coworkers! The MIT license is just chef's kiss—legally allowing you to distribute your blame. Who needs accountability when you have this repo? Your tech debt just became somebody else's problem!

A leaf with patchy coloration gets compared to version control commits. Nature's out here pushing code changes to production without proper code review. That leaf has more commits than my entire GitHub account from 2023. At least Mother Nature doesn't need to deal with merge conflicts or that one coworker who force-pushes to main.

The ultimate developer paradox: a commit message claiming "We avoid breaking changes" while literally changing "We try to introduce breaking changes" to "We try to avoid introducing breaking changes." The irony is just *chef's kiss* – they had to fix their documentation because it accidentally admitted they were intentionally trying to break things! Nothing says "trustworthy software" like a Freudian slip in your release notes that reveals your true chaotic intentions. And they still have the audacity to link to actual breaking changes right below it! 🤦‍♂️

Ah, the classic "change your Git config and push a bug to production" move. It's like framing your coworker for murder, but in code form. This junior dev just performed the digital equivalent of identity theft by changing their Git config to match their senior's name and email, then pushed broken code straight to prod. Now when the blame command runs, it points to the innocent senior dev who's about to have a very confusing conversation with management. Pure corporate sabotage disguised as a rookie mistake. Diabolical.

The eternal battle between GUI lovers and command-line purists rages on! The security team is freaking out about GitHub Desktop while the Linux admin (sporting that glorious CLI-worthy mane) is having none of it. It's like bringing a mouse to a keyboard fight. Real devs type commands with their eyes closed while drinking coffee with their third hand. The GUI crowd might as well be using Fisher-Price "My First Computer" while the command-line warriors judge silently from their black terminal screens. The hair length is directly proportional to terminal proficiency. That's just science.