Thinking How Cool It Would Be To Make A PC Game Vs. Actually Making One

Behold the raw power of NVIDIA's budget GPU! Someone's trying to run Papa's Bakeria (a simple 2D cooking game) with an RTX 5050, and it's struggling at a magnificent 18 FPS . That's right—a next-gen graphics card getting absolutely destroyed by... cake decorating. The poor thing is paired with an i5-10400F and has 8GB VRAM, but clearly that's not enough horsepower to handle the intense physics of virtual frosting. Gaming PC builders spending $300+ on a GPU to achieve PowerPoint-level framerates in a browser game is peak silicon tragedy.

Billion-dollar GPU vs. one efficient Japanese coder? Not even a contest. While we're all chasing fancy hardware to run our bloated, framework-heavy code, Japanese game devs are out here making masterpieces run on calculators. Monster Hunter and Elden Ring weren't built with 16 layers of abstraction and 800MB of node_modules. The rest of us are like "I need a quantum computer to center this div" while they're squeezing every last cycle from hardware like it's still the PS2 era. Efficiency is apparently a lost art everywhere except Japan.

The corporate boardroom at NVIDIA is a special kind of hell. When the boss says "We need to make better GPUs," two executives immediately jump to the money-making strategies: "Add more AI upscaling features!" and "Make it £2000!" Meanwhile, the lone reasonable employee suggests "Maybe some more v-ram and price it fairly." Next frame: That employee gets defenestrated from the building. Because nothing says "valued team member" like being thrown through a window for suggesting consumer-friendly features instead of wallet-draining AI buzzwords. Fun fact: NVIDIA's latest GPUs cost more than my first car, but at least they can render my tears in real-time ray-traced 8K.

Nothing captures the soul-crushing disappointment of mobile game reality quite like this. Those flashy ads show some revolutionary gameplay experience with stunning graphics and deep mechanics. Then you download it and—surprise!—it's just another idle clicker that bombards you with microtransactions every 30 seconds. After 15 years in development, I've seen this same bait-and-switch tactic evolve from "slightly misleading" to "practically criminal." Remember when games were just... games? Now they're psychological experiments designed to extract maximum revenue from your wallet while delivering minimum enjoyment. The perfect game for this meme? Literally any mobile game released in the last five years. Pick one. Any one.

The ultimate flex in computing isn't fancy algorithms or clean code—it's getting Doom to run on literally anything with a circuit board. The iconic FPS game has been ported to calculators, printers, ATMs, and probably your smart fridge by now. It's basically the "Hello World" of hardware hacking, except with demons and shotguns. Those little cacodemon sprites at the bottom perfectly represent the gleeful chaos developers feel when they manage to cram a 1993 game into yet another device that has absolutely no business running it. Because in the world of tech, the question isn't "can we?" but "why haven't we yet?"

Ah yes, the classic "spend more time optimizing than using" paradox. Drop $3K on a liquid-cooled RGB monstrosity capable of simulating alternate universes, then waste half a day installing 147 Skyrim mods to make the horses look prettier and the cheese wheels more realistic. The true endgame isn't actually playing—it's creating a perfectly modded setup that you'll admire from the desktop before launching Steam to buy another game you'll never play. The modding itself becomes the game, and frankly, that's the most expensive puzzle game ever created.