The People Interested In Playing My Game Can Be Categorised Into Two Groups

Ah yes, modern gaming in a nutshell! A massive bear labeled "NEW AAA GAMES" requiring a nuclear-powered rig with "RTX 5090, AMD RX 7900, 64GB RAM, 1TB SSD" just to launch the title screen. Meanwhile, the humble wolf "DOOM 1993" runs perfectly on a calculator with "CPU, GPU (OPTIONAL)" specs. The real joke? That GitHub Actions workflow is gonna time out before your AAA game even finishes downloading the shader cache. Meanwhile, DOOM is probably already running on your CI/CD pipeline's error logs.

The scariest Halloween costume for GameMaker developers isn't a ghost or zombie—it's the "change instance" tool. That innocent-looking red and blue ball icon circled in red is the digital equivalent of performing heart surgery with your eyes closed. One misclick and your carefully crafted game logic transforms into an unholy abomination. Nothing says "I enjoy chaos" quite like accidentally turning all your player characters into explosive barrels mid-development.

The eternal struggle of indie game devs on Reddit: First panel, they post "SUPPORT INDIE DEVELOPERS" with noble intentions. Second panel, they follow up with "MY GAME IS WISHLIST IF IT APPEALS TO YOU!" - a perfectly reasonable request. Third and fourth panels? The same person who was just preaching about supporting indies is now glaring with the fury of a thousand compiler errors. The cognitive dissonance of wanting indie games to succeed... unless they're being promoted in their Reddit feed. It's like saying "I love open source" but then blocking all GitHub notification emails.

Developer proudly ships their shiny new chat feature for the multiplayer game. First player to test it in production? Immediately weaponizes it by pasting the entire Bee Movie script into the chat, causing a catastrophic game freeze for everyone in the lobby. Classic case of not stress-testing input validation. The dev probably thought "nobody would paste that much text into a chat box, right?" Wrong. Players will always find the most creative ways to break your stuff. No character limit? That's an invitation. No rate limiting? Challenge accepted. No input sanitization? Say hello to the entire works of Shakespeare. The ":D" at the end really captures the chaotic energy of someone who just discovered they can DoS an entire game lobby with copypasta. Quality assurance? Never heard of her.

Congratulations! You've achieved the impossible: making a game so beautiful that players are mad it doesn't suck more. This reviewer is basically saying "How dare you make something gorgeous without forcing me to solve obscure puzzles where I need to combine a rubber chicken with a pulley in the middle?" The "finished within Steam's refund window" comment is the chef's kiss of backhanded compliments. Nothing says "your art is wasted" like someone timing their gameplay to maximize their financial efficiency. Next time, maybe add some deliberately frustrating gameplay elements? Perhaps force players to type commands like it's 1985, or add some game-breaking bugs for "authenticity." That'll teach you to make something beautiful but accessible!

When you're looting in a hardcore shooter and stumble upon the most valuable resource known to programmers: FREE DDR5 RAM. Forget the ammo and medical supplies—this van is offering what every developer truly needs. The juxtaposition of a survival FPS where you're supposed to be worried about getting headshot by a camper, but instead you're contemplating whether to download more RAM from this sketchy van is *chef's kiss*. It's like finding a Stack Overflow answer that actually works in the middle of a firefight. DDR5 RAM prices being what they are, you'd probably take more bullets trying to secure this van than it's worth. But hey, 32GB is 32GB.