All Morning Trying To Fix Something In Css...

Content Noo, You can't use on I will check at compile this unknown type, that time if it is defined or not, operator might not be and you can do whatever defined on it the fuck you want with public void FooT t2) template types if (ti t2) El readonly struct System.Boolean Represents a Boolean (true or false) value. CS0019: Operator '' cannot be applied to operands of type "T and T templatetypename T void SystemT:: foo) const Tt; It.asdsdfsdfsdfsdf "sdfsd"; t.asdsdfsdfsdfsdf 100; C C ProarammerHumor

Content Me running out of Area 51 knowing what "this" refers to in JavaScript

The eternal workplace dichotomy exposed! Designers clutch their Pantone swatches in existential dread when a new creative joins the team. "My pixel-perfect mockups... my carefully curated color schemes... was it all for nothing? " Meanwhile, engineers are over in the corner doing the digital equivalent of chest-bumping. New teammate? More brainpower to tackle that legacy codebase nobody wants to touch! Someone else to review those 3,000-line pull requests! Another soul to share the 2AM production hotfix burden! The tribal knowledge grows stronger. The documentation remains unwritten. The technical debt multiplies. But hey—apes together strong. 🦍💻

Content Science • Space NASA confirms it's developing the Moon's new time zone The White House directed the agency to do so by the end of 2026. Will Shanklin Contributing Reporter Fri, Sep 13, 2024 • 2 min read a 9

The user, blissfully unaware, thinks they're interacting with a beautiful frontend while the backend developer lurks behind the scenes making everything actually work. The frontend gets all the praise for being pretty, while the backend carries the entire application on its shoulders. Tale as old as time: users only care about what they can see, not the complex machinery keeping the whole operation from imploding. That backend developer's face says it all - "You're welcome for making this thing functional while the frontend gets all the credit."

Content 3rd - Follow Software Engineer 3d 4 In 2021 a research paper was published showing most efficient programming languages. Paper is here, but sadly behind the paywall. Gotta love "free academic pursuit" where they take in public money and then hide the results. https:Inkd.ingFTCtMzU Anyway: It shows that if people care about energy footprint of their systems, they need to ditch things like ruby, python and perl. Typescript also is super inefficient too. (e) C (e) Rust (e) C (e) Ada (v) Java (e) Pascal (c) Chapel (v) Lisp (c) Ocaml (c) Fortran (e) Swift (c) Haskell (v) C (e) Go (i) Dart (v) F 6) JavaScript (v) Racket (i) TypeScript (i) Hack 6) PHP (v) Erlang G) Lua (i) Jruby G) Ruby G) Python G) Perl Energy 1.00 1.03 1.34 1.70 1.98 2.14 2.18 2.27 2.40 2.52 2.79 3.10 3.14 3.23 3.83 4.13 4.45 7.91 21.50 24.02 29.30 42.23 45.98 46.54 69.91 75.88 79.58 (c) C (c) Rust (e) C (e) Ada (v) Java (c) Chapel (c) Go (c) Pascal (c) Ocaml (v) C (v) Lisp (c) Haskell (c) Swift (c) Fortran (v) F (i) JavaScript () Dart (v) Racket (i) Hack G) PHP (v) Erlang (i) Jruby () TypeScript (i) Ruby G) Perl (i) Python (i) Lua Time 1.00 1.04 1.56 1.85 1.89 2.14 2.83 3.02 3.09 3.14 3.40 3.55 4.20 4.20 6.30 6.52 6.67 11.27 26.99 27.64 36.71 43.44 46.20 59.34 65.79 71.90 82.91 (c) Pascal (e) Go (e) C (c) Fortran (c) C (c) Ada (c) Rust (v) Lisp (c) Haskell G PHP (c) Swift (i) Python (c) Ocaml (v) C (i) Hack (v) Racket (i) Ruby (c) Chapel (v) F (i) JavaScript (i) 'TypeScript (v) Java G Perl (i) Lua (v) Erlang (i) Dart (i) Jruby Mb 1.00 1.05 1.17 1.24 1.34 1.47 1.54 1.92 2.45 2.57 2.71, 2.803 2.82 2.85 3.34 3.52 3.97 4.00 4.25 4.59 4.69 6.01 6.62 6.72 7.20 8.64 19.84 gO 56 23 comments 6 reposts