Fixed Docker Build

The classic "just sprinkle some buzzwords on it" approach to software development! Management thinks moving to the cloud is a magical fix-all solution, then gets annoyed when developers suggest actual architectural changes. And of course, shouting "KUBERNETES!" is the corporate equivalent of yelling "ENHANCE!" at a blurry security camera. Spoiler alert: neither one magically fixes anything without the actual work behind it. The irony is that the boss is simultaneously demanding cloud solutions while rejecting the very practices (containerization, cloud-native architecture) that would make cloud migration successful. Tale as old as time: technical debt wrapped in buzzword bingo, served with a side of hypocrisy.

The cloud computing evolution depicted as a cave of lies! At the surface, we've got that ancient PC gathering dust under some desk—you know, the one IT forgot about but somehow still runs your company's critical payroll system. Dig deeper and you find EC2 instances, the "I'm totally in control of my infrastructure" phase. Go deeper still and there's Kubernetes, where DevOps engineers spend 80% of their time configuring YAML files and 20% explaining why everything is broken. And at the very bottom? "Serverless"—the promised land where servers supposedly don't exist, but you're actually just renting someone else's servers while sacrificing all debugging capabilities. The deeper you go, the more you pay for "simplicity" that requires a PhD to understand!

Ah yes, the classic expectation vs. reality of container deployment. In the cloud, your containers are neatly organized on massive infrastructure with redundancy and professional management. Meanwhile, on your poor overloaded Ubuntu laptop, it's just boxes crammed into a car that's one Docker command away from complete system collapse. That feeling when you've got 17 containers running and your fan sounds like it's preparing for liftoff. Your laptop isn't hosting containers—it's being held hostage by them. And yet we keep typing "docker-compose up" like memory is infinite and thermal throttling is just a myth.

Ah, the classic solopreneur delusion! Why validate your idea with a simple landing page when you can disappear into the engineering rabbit hole instead? Nothing says "I'm a serious developer" quite like meticulously crafting a CI/CD pipeline for an app that literally nobody asked for and probably never will. The true entrepreneurial spirit: ignoring market validation in favor of building infrastructure that would impress your developer friends... if only they cared. But hey, at least you'll have the most robust deployment system for your zero users!

The classic "too afraid to ask" situation but with a DevOps twist. This is that developer who's been nodding along in meetings for months while everyone discusses CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure as code, and Kubernetes clusters. Meanwhile, they're secretly googling "what does DevOps actually do" under their desk. It's like watching your coworkers enthusiastically discuss quantum physics while you're still trying to figure out how magnets work. The deployment pipeline is breaking? Just smile and say "must be a config issue" while internally screaming.

OMG the AUDACITY of dependency issues to show up at the LAST POSSIBLE SECOND! There you are, arms outstretched like some desperate romantic, ready to embrace your perfectly debugged dev build that's finally, FINALLY ready to deploy. You can practically taste the sweet nectar of deployment success! But then BAM! That pink dependency issue monster swoops in and YOINKS your dreams away faster than free pizza disappears at a hackathon. And the worst part? Your build was SO CLOSE you could practically touch it! The betrayal! The drama! The absolute TRAGEDY of modern software development!