When Zero-Width Spaces Attack

Content ROOT CAUSE WHAT ARE YOU DOING? DEBUGGING GOTCHA! REAL PROBLEM SHIT MONKEYUSER.CoM

Content Re: Regression - prockmsg does not ... From Jukka Ollila Greg KH Jukka Ollila Alan Cox Linus Torvalds Tallen Allie. Sent On Jul 6, 2012 10:45 am Jul 6, 2012 10:54 am Jul 6, 2012 11:45 am Jul 6, 2012 12:34 pm Jul 6, 2012 1:30 pm 1ul a 3019 2.05 nm Subject: Re: Regression - prockmsg does not (always) block for 1-byte reads From: Linus Torvalds (torvlinux-foundation.org) Date: Jul 6, 2012 1:30:01 pm List: org. kernel. vger.linux-kernel Kay, this needs to be fixed. Suggested fix: just use the 'seg printf0' interfaces, which do the proper buffering, and allow any size reads of various packetized data. Of course, I'd also suggest that whoever was the genius who thought it was a good idea to read things ONE FCKING BYTE AT A TIME with system calls for each byte should be retroactively aborted. Who the fck does idiotic things like that? How did they noty die as babies, considering that they were likely too stupid to find a tit to suck on? Linus

OH MY STARS AND GARTERS! The absolute AUDACITY of pushing untested code to dev at 4:59 PM on a Friday! 💅✨ It's the classic "not my problem until Monday" energy that only the most chaotic developers possess. Like, honey, you're literally creating a weekend emergency while dancing on the grave of your team's sanity! That code is going to break SPECTACULARLY while you're sipping margaritas, and some poor on-call dev will be crying into their keyboard. ICONIC BEHAVIOR. 👑

Content What we say What we mean Horrible hack Homble hack that I didnt write Temporary workaround Homble hack that I wrote 'S broken There are bugs in your code It has a few issues There are bugs in my code Obscure Someone else's code doesn't have comments Self-documenting My code doesn't have comments That's why it's an awesome anquage It's my favorite language and it's really easy to do something in it. You're thinking in the wrong mindset It's my favorite language and it's really hard to do something in it. I can read this Perl script I wrote this Perl script I can't read this Perl script I didn't write this Perl script bad structure Someone else's code is badly organized Complex structure My code is badly organized Bug The absence of a feature I like our or scone The absence of a feature I don't like Clean solution It works and l understand it Wencedto rewrite it It works but I don't understand it emacs is better than vi It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war vi is better than emacs It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war IMHO yourare wrote Legacy code It works, but no one knows how AXCquit (ESCESCJC I don't know how to quit vi

Content public class MakeGameGood : monobehaviour 5 6 7 8 public void Start) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 SpawnworldO); MakeGraphics4k0); MakeMultiplayer); AddCutscenes); for (int i 0; i 500; i) FixBugs);

The modern developer's ultimate get-out-of-work card! When your manager catches you sword fighting with a coworker instead of fixing that critical production bug, just say your "code's vibing" and watch them back away slowly. It's the perfect excuse – vague enough to sound like you're doing something innovative, yet technical enough that no one wants to ask follow-up questions. Bonus points if you add "it's in a flow state" or "the algorithm is self-optimizing" while maintaining intense eye contact.