What Was That

You know that feeling when you try to refactor your emotions like they're legacy code? "I'll just extract this sadness into a helper function, make it more modular, maybe wrap it in a try-catch..." But nope, your emotional compiler just throws the same exception right back at you. Turns out feelings don't have unit tests, and no amount of design patterns can fix a broken mental state. You can't just apply SOLID principles to your psyche and expect it to suddenly become maintainable. Sometimes the bug is a feature, and the feature is depression. Pro tip from someone who's been there: Emotions are like that one monolithic function with 500 lines of nested if-statements. You can't refactor it—you just have to live with it until the sprint ends.

That timestamp isn't just any date—it's the sacred Unix epoch, the moment when computer time began. January 1, 1970, at precisely midnight UTC. The digital equivalent of "In the beginning..." for computers. Spot this timestamp in your logs and you know something's deeply wrong. Either your system thinks it's partying like it's 1970, or your timestamp logic has completely given up on life. No developer sees this without getting that cold shiver down their spine—the unmistakable feeling that a weekend of debugging awaits.

First frame: Seeing a ternary operator with an empty string fallback. Second frame: Realizing they wrapped it in a try-catch block that does exactly the same thing if it fails. That face when you discover someone wrote defensive code against their defensive code. It's like wearing a life jacket while sitting inside a lifeboat... that's inside another lifeboat. The redundancy is so beautifully pointless it's almost art.

Content Enter your age 17 User with this age already exists

Content When you finally have an idea on how to fix the bug.

Content Print the largest number Print the 7th largest number