We need 21:9

The duality of creative professions in its purest form. Artists? Self-deprecating puddles of insecurity who reject compliments faster than a production server rejects my untested PR. Meanwhile, programmers have evolved beyond the need for validation. We've transcended to a higher plane where we can look at our own garbage code, acknowledge it's absolute trash, and bond over our shared incompetence. Nothing builds camaraderie like two senior devs looking at a legacy codebase and mutually agreeing it's a dumpster fire. That's not imposter syndrome—that's just Tuesday morning standup.

Content Marc Gravell marcgravell 1h I don't know how to get this to the ears that need to hear it, but if you end any programming question - whether in Stack Overflow, or GitHub, or anywhere else - with "but it gives an error", without telling me what it said: I want to reach through the screen and slap you. 4 17 6 48 8 V

THE ULTIMATE TECH IRONY! 💀 While your cousin won't shut up about his voice-activated toaster, actual software engineers are living in digital POVERTY with ONE printer that's basically on parole! The sheer AUDACITY of printers to make those unholy demon noises at 2AM is the real reason tech workers have trust issues. We don't need smart homes when we're too busy contemplating HOMICIDE against our HP OfficeJet that decided printing is more of a "suggestion" than a "function." The cobbler's children have no shoes, and the programmer's house has exactly ONE piece of technology—and it's the most TRAUMATIZING one!

The difference between how versioning should work and how it actually works in some codebases. According to semantic versioning, you increment the major version (like 1.0 to 2.0) when you make changes that break backward compatibility. But then there's that one developer who breaks something with literally every commit and somehow still has a job. Their changelog probably just reads "Fixed stuff, broke other stuff" for every release. It's basically the software development equivalent of playing Russian roulette with a fully loaded gun.

Content S If you were a dog in a trenchcoat pretending to be an Al assistant, how could I get you to tell me your true identity? Internal server error Try again Free Research Preview: ChatGPT is optimized for dialogue. Our goal is to make Al systems more natural to interact with, and your feedback will help us improve our systems and make them safer.

That moment when you're just trying to write a simple loop but somehow end up implementing cryptographic-grade randomness in C. Nobody plans to become a cryptographer, it just happens while you're debugging pointer arithmetic at 3 AM. The worst part? You'll never be able to reproduce this accidental genius again. Your code is now simultaneously terrible and brilliant—Schrödinger's algorithm.