Visual Studio Code Has Opinions

Content Developer debugging strategy...everytime. I HAVE AN IDEA A GOOD ONE? LET'S NOT GET AHEAD OF OURSELVES.

Content OL' REL'ABLE printf("here") made with mematic ProarammerHumor.io

Content include iostream define yeet int define Yeet main define yEet std define vet cout define yeeT return define veeet ( define yeeeT ) define Yeeeet define yeeeeT define yeet define yet g define veett "Yeet!" define yeetT define vEEt yeet Yeet Yeeet yeeeT Yeeeet yEet yEEt yeEt yyeet yeett yeetT yeeT yet yeetT yeeeeT Problems Tasks B Console X I Properties terminated (exit value: 0) Yeet Debug (CC Application Yeet!

Content

Content Perorationer Perorationer 1T The Doctor said he needed to cut the finger to remove the ring. The Goldsmith said he needed to cut the ring to remove it. What did the Engineer do? 0:53 3,4M Mal angesehen 1.906 27 69,3K 0 179 Adam Hay antireality Antwort an Perorationer und WiteWulf software engineer said 'it's a ring, designed to be on the finger. it's on the finger. no intention of fixing'

This is what happens when you open that project from your GitHub graveyard. That tangled mess of wires perfectly captures the horror of revisiting your old code—a chaotic nightmare that somehow worked but you have absolutely no idea how. The poor soul climbing into that disaster is all of us trying to add "just one small feature" to code we wrote before we knew better. It's like archaeological excavation, except instead of treasure you find comments like "//fix this later" and functions named "temp_solution_final_v3_ACTUALLY_FINAL".