The Most Literal Bug In Programming History

Content Quincy Larson ossia When you're fundraising, it's Al. When you're hiring, it's ML. When you're implementing, it's linear regression. When you're debugging, it's printfO. - Baron Schwartz (xaprb Abonn

The expectation: "I'll code by intuition and feeling, letting my creativity flow." The reality: Your brain on fire, frantically computing a thousand wrong answers per second while basic math equations mock you from the background. Nothing says "senior developer" like confidently writing 200 lines of code only to be defeated by 5+6=9 . It's not a bug, it's a feature of the human condition.

This comic brilliantly captures how different dev roles handle bugs with wildly different energy levels. JavaScript devs panic-flee from bugs like they're on fire (accurate), then copy-paste Stack Overflow solutions while literally burning, and convince themselves the weight of technical debt is totally fine. Classic. Backend devs go full Batman mode—methodically tracking down bugs with detective skills, then hunting down whichever dev committed the cursed code. The cape is metaphorical but the intimidation is real. Web devs are Spider-Man releasing bugs into production, then trying to "organize" them (read: make it worse), until someone yells "SUDO" and they have no choice but to comply. The power of root commands compels you! Technical Support are the Jedi mind-tricking users that obvious bugs are "features." Three times. With a straight face. It's not a crash, it's an unexpected exit feature! QA is literally Godzilla destroying everything in sight, then casually leaving. Their job is chaos, and they're excellent at it. C++ devs can't find bugs because they're too busy dealing with segfaults, memory leaks, and undefined behavior. Solution? Rage quit with rm -rf and the Infinity Gauntlet. If you can't fix it, delete everything.

Bragging about 10k lines of code per day is like bragging about eating 47 hot dogs in one sitting. Sure, it's technically impressive, but everyone knows you're going to regret it later. When 35% of those lines are tests, you're really just admitting you write 6,500 lines of actual code without anyone checking if it works first. No code review, no pair programming, just raw unfiltered chaos being committed straight to main. The real question isn't about regression bugs—it's about when the entire codebase achieves sentience and decides to quit.

Oh. My. GOD! The sacred commandment of code has been perfectly illustrated by this absolute MASTERPIECE of plumbing ingenuity! 💀 That broken pipe with water miraculously flowing THROUGH THE HOLE instead of leaking?! It's the physical manifestation of that horrifying moment when your janky code works for reasons that defy the laws of computer science! Every developer has that one unholy abomination in production—held together by duct tape, prayers, and Stack Overflow answers from 2011—that we're TERRIFIED to refactor. Touch it? And risk TOTAL SYSTEM COLLAPSE? Absolutely not! Ship it and RUN AWAY!

Content How other people debug their code O cm passing docs 0.50 pair programming docker? containerisation rubber-ducl debugging integration testin code quality known unknowns pproval processes SanS coge.passwora.um.Passwordunsiest tePassword Nut passed (0.003 s) Password Missing OneNumber passed (0.0 s) Password Missing OneUopercaseletter passe Password Missing Onelowercaseletter passe How I debug my code breakpoint gun Ini set('displayerrors', 1); google Console. log.out ("FUCK32534) MSDN? stackoverflow some notes i made in 2008 literal blood sacrifice